John__Taylor

iTrader: (3)

Came up with this. Its a bit bigger than the optimal 2.2 cubes, but once I subtract the sub, fill, etc, should be close. Does it look ok? No glaring mistakes? THANKS!!

jalat

iTrader: (6)

should be alright, maybe knock off 0.1 cue if you wanna be closer to 2.2 cubes but its nothing to cry over. my only concern is try to make the enclosure so the cut angle id easy to make on the table saw. 76 degree angles will be hard than if your near 75 degrees

John__Taylor

iTrader: (3)

Thanks for taking the time to look at it jalat. Appreciate it!

PsychoAcoustics Canada

iTrader: (3)

Why even use an angle to begin with? Just make it a cube. Much easier.

I LOVE XPlOD

great sketch

Killer_klown187

iTrader: (20)

It will be fine im sure, and like Don said, Why use angles unless its going into a tight fitting space? the look factor doesn't mean much, the sound is what matters right?

ancientpimp

Looks good, but use a roundover bit on the port end (at the bend and inside too) might throw your tuning a tad off (sorry, cant remember if flaring the port means add about an inch in port length)

John__Taylor

iTrader: (3)

My fault for not splainin correctly. I have one of those mini SUV things, Ford Escrape. Cargo area is enough to curl up in if youre loaded, but still small.

I have 4 amps to mount in there( HI BRENT) (2 in possession right now) and am limited as to box design for the new sub(s). Currently have a huge *** dual 12" setup, almost 4 cubes, Infinity Kappas 122.7W, going to at least one, maybe 2 of a much, much more powerful sub.

So...if I build the usual rectangle it fires A: Towards roof. B: Right into back seats. C: Directly in to hatch.

I figured to split the diff between back seat and roof. Cosmetics are the least of my concerns, really.

Thank you for the opinions guys!

John