General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

10, 12, or 15?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2004, 12:15 PM
  #11  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
SQLStephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,353
Post

I've ran 10's,12's and 15's I always go back to 12's. They seem to work best in my application, so 12's are ideal for me. [img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
SQLStephen is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 03:09 PM
  #12  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Bulldogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,474
Post

15's
Bulldogger is offline  
Old 10-24-2004, 09:43 PM
  #13  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
Hardwrkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,542
Post

The size of the sub is not going to dictate it's transient response.

If you like that punchy/snap sensation look at your midbass.

Measurements dictate the driver size for me. If the install calls for the driver to fire forward or back then the trunk has to be tall enough for the sub. Same with width. I also need enough airspace for the driver to work to its full potential.

I like to have a lot of bass on tap.
Once I've figured out how big physically of a driver I can fit I will calculate airspace. Then I will take the optimal box sizes and find the best possible option to get the most Sd.
Say I have 5cu.ft. of net airspace and I can only fit 10's or 12's in the install. Out of the driver's I'm using in that car the 10's work well with 1.0 and the 12's with 2.5cu.ft.
so in this car I could go with four 10's or two 12's.

Of course price and power comes into effect also but you get the idea.

[ October 24, 2004, 10:46 PM: Message edited by: Hardwrkr ]
Hardwrkr is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 09:52 PM
  #14  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Cavalier Chunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,423
Post

well i prefer 10's but hey what do i know this is my first set of subs and thier jensen
Cavalier Chunk is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 10:03 PM
  #15  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
M.C. Ryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 467
Post

I've always been a fan of a 12 myself... it's a comprimise between the 10 and the 15...
M.C. Ryan is offline  
Old 10-26-2004, 10:54 PM
  #16  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
WeDgE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 158
Post

15" and nothing less. [img]smile.gif[/img]
WeDgE is offline  
Old 10-27-2004, 02:46 AM
  #17  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
ChizzerZ24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,417
Post

I've bounced back and forth, and I am more of a 10" woofer fan then anything, granted I have 12" Eclipse now but that's used as my powerd sub for surround sound.
ChizzerZ24 is offline  
Old 10-27-2004, 06:38 AM
  #18  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
TomK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,649
Post

15"

But have to make sure you get into something that can play down to match in with it or you'll have a nice hole in the frequency spectrum.
TomK is offline  
Old 11-01-2004, 11:39 AM
  #19  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Eli47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 952
Post

I have to disagree with you people that think that the size of the sub will not affect transient response .

When you think about it, why have home speaker manufacturers opted for multiple small woofers as opposed to larger ones? No, not for a smaller footprint because of the "Wife factor".
Eli47 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 PM.