General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Active VS Passive = Power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2006, 10:32 PM
  #1  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Sr SQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 307
Active VS Passive = Power

Hope I put this in the right catagory?
Right now running my passive xovers I am hitting my QSDs with a lot of power 200w rms per mid and 150w rms per tweet Bi wired thru the xovers but I am going to go to a active set-up and wonder if I should step down my power? For those actively skilled would you recommend me keeping it the same or using a couple of smaller amps? Is it a moot point or is there and differences I need to worry about? I just seems many active systems only use a 4x50w amp?
Sr SQ is offline  
Old 11-29-2006, 10:52 PM
  #2  
Administrator
 
Dukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,855
Lightbulb

More power is rarely a bad thing. Go through a proper gain setup routine and take it easy, paying attention to how your speakers react to the power. Then adjust your gains again to suit.
Dukk is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 09:45 AM
  #3  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Tom.F.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,217
Lots of power is good, just make sure you use the right frequencies for the speakers.
Mid-bass will need a HPF at about 80 hz, they'll die with sub freqs.
Tom.F.1 is offline  
Old 11-30-2006, 10:41 PM
  #4  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Sr SQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 307
Thanks guys I was just looking at other peoples systems that were running without the passives and many seemed to be running only 50-100w per channel so..... I figured I was making a big mistake using my current power.
Sr SQ is offline  
Old 12-02-2006, 09:20 AM
  #5  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
BigRedGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,383
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Sr SQ
Thanks guys I was just looking at other peoples systems that were running without the passives and many seemed to be running only 50-100w per channel so..... I figured I was making a big mistake using my current power.
It only becomes a big mistake when your tweeter's VC's melt into little puddles of copper....

Like they said, just be very careful with your gains.....
BigRedGuy is offline  
Old 12-02-2006, 03:37 PM
  #6  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
PT-Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 514
I run active in my truck using DLS Iridum 6.2 on a Db Drive 120.4 so 120rms per speaker


They seem to handle the power well, the tweeters require about half the power, sounds so much better then passive!!
PT-Chris is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alphadawg
General SQ
39
02-19-2009 10:13 PM
Trojan
General SQ
6
09-15-2007 09:09 PM
Buzz
General SQ
21
04-03-2007 12:54 AM
tymbitz
General Discussion
18
11-29-2006 07:02 AM
95Probite
General Discussion
1
08-16-2005 11:08 AM



Quick Reply: Active VS Passive = Power



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.