General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

all you ppl that thinks sony sucks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2003, 11:42 PM
  #21  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
slow/n\low's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Post

Anyone ever think that maybe the reason that you might see a lot more sony going defective than some brands is based on sales volume?

Id love to see there defective to sales ratio.

people on this forum talk about how great some other brands are and how reliable and terrific they are( i.e E.D, Brahma,shiva, what ever the flavour is)

Wonder how many woofers other companies sell in comparison to sony? [img]graemlins/freak.gif[/img] (Sony must be doing something right, it sells!! and a hell of a lot more volume then any of the prefered brands on this forum [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] )

Install it properly and it should work fine.
slow/n\low is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 07:30 AM
  #22  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Chadxton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,707
Post

Slow/n\low is right. Sony markets their products to no end and they get the results. Therefore one may seem to notice a higher failure rate. I can't say it's entirely fault of the product. Pointing out what Dukk said, even though it's a well known company, it has its limits.
Sony is a good bang for the buck, if a sub dies, it's not the end of the world to buy another one.
Any sub will miss notes and flop badly if its in the wrong box.
Chadxton is offline  
Old 07-22-2003, 11:00 AM
  #23  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Orion_95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,260
Post

Originally posted by namster44:
I joined this forum just to reply to this thread, and all I have to say is that sony sucks plenty. I have bought one just to see what it can handle, and it can't handle anything. I sent it like 180 RMS from a JBL 180.2 and the thing missed notes and bottomed out all the time, meanwhile Sony claimed to have at 800 Peak, and 400 RMS rating on their sub. The gains were set properly, no bass boost or anything, no clipped signal. Just pure crap. If you are looking to buy something in the Sony price range, look into Pioneer.

sounds like poor box design to me...
Orion_95 is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 03:24 PM
  #25  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
lemonlime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 756
Post

Sony used to have some really great stuff like the C90, C910 etc. (Mobile ES), but now their stuff is junk compared to most brands. Its true that a lot of it is in the install, with properly designed enclosures, you can get some pretty impressive SPL numbers. Bottom line is that you get what you pay for in most cases. Sony stuff costs next to nothing today.
lemonlime is offline  
Old 07-24-2003, 04:12 PM
  #26  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Orion_95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,260
Post

the problem is that a sony 10" is like $99, and people try to compare them to $999 10"S. Obviously the 2nd one is going to be better...ITS 10X THE FREAKIN PRICE!
Orion_95 is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 07:36 AM
  #27  
Guest
iTrader: (4)
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 7,724
Post

bump.. just because some people think it's closed..
ChrisB is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 08:23 AM
  #28  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Chadxton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,707
Talking

IT'S ALL LOGAN'S FAULT!!
Chadxton is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 08:25 AM
  #29  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Thumper89's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,819
Post

Originally posted by Orion_95:
the problem is that a sony 10" is like $99, and people try to compare them to $999 10"S. Obviously the 2nd one is going to be better...ITS 10X THE FREAKIN PRICE!
If I may,not to cause problems,but to make a small point...

CD Player:$180 a year ago
8 Track Player:Free
MTX RT2200X for fronts(refurb):$150 a year ago
2-12" Kicker Impulse subs(used):$60(with box)
US Accoustics 2200(used):$200
Misc.wiring,plugs,etc:ballpark of $50

So if the more expensive stuff is better,how come I am beating at least a 1/3 of the people in my class?

I may not place,but I do walk away most of the time pretty close to the placers...

Just my thoughts......
Thumper89 is offline  
Old 08-05-2003, 08:44 AM
  #30  
Guest
iTrader: (4)
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 7,724
Post

Originally posted by TEAM8TRACK:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Orion_95:
the problem is that a sony 10" is like $99, and people try to compare them to $999 10"S. Obviously the 2nd one is going to be better...ITS 10X THE FREAKIN PRICE!
If I may,not to cause problems,but to make a small point...

CD Player:$180 a year ago
8 Track Player:Free
MTX RT2200X for fronts(refurb):$150 a year ago
2-12" Kicker Impulse subs(used):$60(with box)
US Accoustics 2200(used):$200
Misc.wiring,plugs,etc:ballpark of $50

So if the more expensive stuff is better,how come I am beating at least a 1/3 of the people in my class?

I may not place,but I do walk away most of the time pretty close to the placers...

Just my thoughts......
</font>[/QUOTE]I think what orion_95 is trying to get at, will all things being equal (proper box, tuning, position, power, etc) most of the time the one that's 10x the price will win. But unfortionatly most of the time products aren't placed in the proper box, and the installs aren't always the greatest..
ChrisB is offline  


Quick Reply: all you ppl that thinks sony sucks



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:03 AM.