General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

another reason why sanctioning is a waste of time and money

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2009, 05:27 PM
  #31  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (66)
 
MR2NR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,420
Count me in on that as well, provided someone can pick me up and drop me off at the ferry terminal. Otherwise it is another $180.00 in stupid ferry charges just to get there and back.
MR2NR is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 08:06 PM
  #33  
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Father Yuli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,606
and the battle rages on......

this is the kind of a debate i'd normally find myself being involved in, but for some reason i dont seem to really care. hmmm.
Father Yuli is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 09:07 PM
  #34  
Goalie Man
 
goalie 35's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,412
well i must say i agree with you completly dave on the beer part! ummmmmmm pilsner!!!!!!
goalie 35 is offline  
Old 02-25-2009, 10:05 PM
  #35  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
zzzzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
Originally Posted by icebird88
DEFRO.

I am only going to say this one more time.

If BC is going to hold IASCA shows they will need more judges . Others who obviously a expert in the field of 12v will need some training.

ALSO nobody will have to go to SBN or Ontario to become a judge. I am more then Willing to come out there and host a training but I need to go over with someone who wants to help with the training how that works. I need a promoter out there who wants to tackle this with me.

Also considering IASCA has not had a training out there in some time I would love to know who is judging these shows.

I am 100% certain after reading your comments that the time has come where I need to recertify SOME of these judges.


I am going to some investigating with Moe and see whats been taking place out WEST.
this i hope you do .

what i see ,i do not like and soon i will stop going to IASCA shows.
i will call you soon .

Also considering IASCA has not had a training out there in some time I would love to know who is judging these shows.
he comes up form W.A
zzzzzzz is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 02:34 PM
  #36  
Administrator
 
Dukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,855
Dave - If sanctioning is so useless, I don't see why you want to be certified (for free) and hold sanctioned events (for free). Your supposition that IASCA would get more out of it than you is weak.

Randy (goalie35) has a decent proposal.
Dukk is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:15 PM
  #38  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
SUX 2BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,351
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought there was some training out west in either 2005 or 2006? Can't recall if it was local or down in Portland or something. I know some locals went down and got 'certified'. To be honest, some of those judges I would not want judging my car or holding their judgement to be of any usefulness. One guy was a fairly recent competitor and entrant into the world of SQ and now he's a judge? Me no likey. Like Jason said, just because you are a judge doesn't mean you know how a car should sound or how a system should be installed. For that reason, I support a judges training that lasts more than 1/2 day.

Jason, at a judges training session, do you just go over the rule book or do you actually go over specific items to look for in installatino for things like creativity and what to listen for on the CD, along perhaps with a sound system to show what you are speaking of? If you are, an online course wouldn't work.
SUX 2BU is offline  
Old 02-26-2009, 05:45 PM
  #40  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
sawnicxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by defro13
ok...so we go to a judges training, we listen to all the stuff, we read the book, we buy out cd,s and blah blah blah........does that then make us good judges.....is experience judging not far more important......and i am going to regret saying this but.....i often wonder what some judges reference is....and by reference i mean their reference system
There are some good points to take from this, but I think we are running into a transition problem between ability and availability with the exception of Dave's situation. I know for a fact that there are a lot of people out there in Greater Vancouver and Alberta who have fantastic ears and ability who have been around for decades and not bothered to remained involved in IASCA. Would they go to training...perhaps, but they are tired of being around for marginal events and/or personal reasons.

Then you have the availability that falls mostly on newer guys in SQ. They possess all kinds of availability, and so IASCA trains them and throws them out to judge. It becomes a tough call when all of the people with years of ability are not wanting to remain involved and perhaps some who are shouldn't be because of low levels of experience.

Reference plays a major part of this too. Generally you will find that judges who have not just heard, but also set up hundreds of cars along with really experimenting in them will go a long way. There references become a long list of cars, high end home (no, not your dad's kenwood home system) and listening to live rooms. You cannot gain this experience in 2 or 3 seasons of listening to a some cars, a demo room, or setting up your own saturday night. I know that it's not always the case, but experience does play a major factor.

I guess the problem is that IASCA has to pick judges from an availability standpoint in people, but from what I hear/read, they need some more from an ability standpoint.
sawnicxs is offline  


Quick Reply: another reason why sanctioning is a waste of time and money



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:10 PM.