a and b sound.
50 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 467
Originally posted by Pioneer Guy:
P.S. Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest if A&B is owned by Seanix who in turn supplies its' competitors? "Oops, sorry (FS, BB, Visions), we forgot to ship your order this month." Could they gouge them while giving a better price to A&B? Hmmm...
P.S. Wouldn't that be a conflict of interest if A&B is owned by Seanix who in turn supplies its' competitors? "Oops, sorry (FS, BB, Visions), we forgot to ship your order this month." Could they gouge them while giving a better price to A&B? Hmmm...
If you are a supplier and have four companies you sell to (A&B, FS, BB, Visions) why would you chance losing the extra business by not shipping one of them? This is another way of making a profit in two places, selling to A&B and then selling from A&B to the end user...
The only conflict of interest might be from the other retail stores wanting to directly compete with the manufacturer now that they have retail outlets...
500 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 548
Originally posted by defro13:
lets pose a hypothetical....what if they were to become an audiotronics frachise and agreed to close all the stores that had existing audiotronics franchises in place, alot of people would get the axe
lets pose a hypothetical....what if they were to become an audiotronics frachise and agreed to close all the stores that had existing audiotronics franchises in place, alot of people would get the axe
Cujo, you missed what Dave was saying. Andre's where Dave works for example is a Audiotronics. He is in a market with a A&B Sound as direct competition. What he is thinking is that if the A&B Sound was renamed as franchise of Audiotronics to A&B Audiotronics. A condition of this change laid out by A&B Sound would be that when the names change happens, the existing Audiotronics stores like the one that Dave works at, would either have to close down or do a complete name change and lose the Audiotronics program. Correct Dave?
