Boston Acoustic VS Alpine - Help
12-10-2003, 03:23 PM
#11
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
I was thinking more along the lines of a CQ-DFX983U
or a CQ-HX1083U
I will try and get a chance to listen to both, and see what is better... but I have a feeling its gonna be real difficult to see any major differences in SQ.
or a CQ-HX1083U
I will try and get a chance to listen to both, and see what is better... but I have a feeling its gonna be real difficult to see any major differences in SQ.
12-10-2003, 04:15 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
niether one of tose panisonics have built in high pass filters and both only offer 80/120 hz lo pass options ........80 hz is too high IMO they should have a 50/60hz option
I like the looks of the panisonic units, but I find they do not offer the signal processing options for the dollars spent
I agree with dukk on the brands to choose [img]smile.gif[/img]
but I want to stress this is all up to you ........ you are buying for yourself so get something you'll be happy with .....
I like the looks of the panisonic units, but I find they do not offer the signal processing options for the dollars spent
I agree with dukk on the brands to choose [img]smile.gif[/img]
but I want to stress this is all up to you ........ you are buying for yourself so get something you'll be happy with .....
12-11-2003, 08:14 AM
#13
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
I will be happy with what is functional, and looks have decent!
I dont care if you guys tell me what to get.... because those numbers you gave me dont mean a thing! but now I know Alpine would be a better choice.
What do those numbers mean anyhow? hehe.. gotta start somewhere
I dont care if you guys tell me what to get.... because those numbers you gave me dont mean a thing! but now I know Alpine would be a better choice.
What do those numbers mean anyhow? hehe.. gotta start somewhere
