MP3's vs. original recording SQ??
#11
Originally Posted by tonez735
Does anyone here know off the top of their head if the Eclipse 8445 is ipod ready? I think it is but I can't recall for sure.
#13
The first time I encoded some songs for MP3 I did it at either 98kbs or 64mbs, whatever was lower so I could fit more songs on my mp3 discman.
at that time I wasnt old enough to drive, but the thing was so bad I couldnt listen to it on a discman.
128 isnt terrible but you definately can tell its MP3
at that time I wasnt old enough to drive, but the thing was so bad I couldnt listen to it on a discman.
128 isnt terrible but you definately can tell its MP3
#14
128kbit/s lies on the cusp of audibility for your average commercial recording..... if you have something really dynamic then 192kbit/s is probably as good as most people will need.. but by all means go higher..
the use of dynamic encoders is becomming quite popular... the idea is to encode run of the mill compressed program at a lower bitrate and during a dynamic passage encode at a higher bit rate where it matters....
the use of dynamic encoders is becomming quite popular... the idea is to encode run of the mill compressed program at a lower bitrate and during a dynamic passage encode at a higher bit rate where it matters....
#15
Originally Posted by DesolataX
Get an 80GB ipod video and an ipod compatible deck (not aux in), rip everything as lossless m4a.
Only way to go if you don't want to carry around all those cd's.
Only way to go if you don't want to carry around all those cd's.
#17
Originally Posted by DV8ion
Sorry for the odd question, but what is the difference between an Ipod ready deck and just using a "AUX in" ? Just curious because I don't have an Ipod (I have a Creative MP3 player) and was thinking about running it through the AUX in. Will I get horrible results if I do this?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post