Opinions on Rockford Symmetry EXP2?
03-16-2004, 08:18 AM
#61
and at this point are you trying to tell everyone that 'George' is your friend and how stupid i am? that is very usefull with regards to the EXP. i think u are stupid and i think your opinion is wrong. your posts are useless all accross the forum and no one cares what u have to say......here is a mature response that is right about at your level, this should make it easier for you to understand my point. with this i hope to hit your level of maturity, if i try to any lower that would be below ground level.
03-16-2004, 09:38 AM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Aw fer crying out loud.. You guys drive me nuts.
So, you want a deck-based system that can do what the EPX did..
Clarion ACDS-1
Pioneer DEX-P9 and DEQ-P9 combo
Alpine F#1 Status system
Sure, they have add-on processors, but whatever, the EPX is a two-piece system...
Why do you guys always have to think so negatively all the time? Why try and think of products that don't do what something does and think of product that do the same and even more? How about some time alignment, how about some digital inputs, how about digital outputs to run to the amplifiers? Digital graphic and parametric equalizers and so forth??
I was watching Monster Garage last night.. Neat build, old-school custom cars chopped and channelled a 54 chevy into a gorgeous hot-rod.. Not one member whined, complained or argued about how to build the car. They all did their job, masterfully without complaining. I'm tired of complaining. Jesse should impliment a new rule on Monster Garage to make it like all the other reality shows, let the team members vote someone off half way though the show.
Anyways gang, I am outta here for a few weeks.. have fun fighting amongst yourselves.
So, you want a deck-based system that can do what the EPX did..
Clarion ACDS-1
Pioneer DEX-P9 and DEQ-P9 combo
Alpine F#1 Status system
Sure, they have add-on processors, but whatever, the EPX is a two-piece system...
Why do you guys always have to think so negatively all the time? Why try and think of products that don't do what something does and think of product that do the same and even more? How about some time alignment, how about some digital inputs, how about digital outputs to run to the amplifiers? Digital graphic and parametric equalizers and so forth??
I was watching Monster Garage last night.. Neat build, old-school custom cars chopped and channelled a 54 chevy into a gorgeous hot-rod.. Not one member whined, complained or argued about how to build the car. They all did their job, masterfully without complaining. I'm tired of complaining. Jesse should impliment a new rule on Monster Garage to make it like all the other reality shows, let the team members vote someone off half way though the show.
Anyways gang, I am outta here for a few weeks.. have fun fighting amongst yourselves.
03-16-2004, 10:01 AM
#68
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 419
Thanks for the input DMAC...I like the idea of the EPX2 because my current source unit is fine and I don't want time alignment. All I want is a ****pit adjustable EQ and cross-over. And I don't want to break the bank. I was considering a DQX, however, an EPX seems to do pretty much the same thing.
Lawrence.
Lawrence.
03-16-2004, 10:11 AM
#70
500 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Nothing wrong with Brain farts.
just say " I had a Brain Fart, and I was wrong."
Its ok to be wrong once in a while.
Oh and FISHBONE, go for the EPX it is a great piece. Give you great flexability, and the RDAT makes it great for tuning up front.
just say " I had a Brain Fart, and I was wrong."
Its ok to be wrong once in a while.
Oh and FISHBONE, go for the EPX it is a great piece. Give you great flexability, and the RDAT makes it great for tuning up front.
