General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

A watt is a watt is a watt!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #11  
Brandon's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,603
Post

Hehehe.....Poor Sony.

They have some decent home stuff though. lol
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 06:20 PM
  #12  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

Haunz, look up Slew Rate, it should answer your question.

Adam
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 08:58 PM
  #13  
sleboda's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 117
Post

When I'm looking at amp's...The first thing I look at is the RMS...and then the Damping factor.....Peak watts don't mean anything to me...

another very simple way to views amps is what they cost..., a 200rms amp for $400 is much better than a 400peak amp for $200 or heck even $400.

I'm been told, the greater the damping rate, the more it can "control" the sub...pushing it in and out.....also the more subs it can control (is this true?)

what does the Slew rate mean...for ex: >50V/ms...Volts/milli second?...as a reference

http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?...731728713&rd=1

yet another way is just view the Freq Range....instead of the 20 to 20 (20Hz - 20KHz)...PPI's impressive 4.5Hz-100KHz..looks like it's bettre...even though us Humans, can only feel something that low, and can't hear anything near that high...
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #14  
Audio_Rookie's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 784
Post

lol, so true. like the 100khz will enhance your music at all. atleast you can feel the 4.5Hz.
Old Nov 17, 2004 | 10:23 PM
  #16  
Mr. Marco's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,221
Post

i do recall reading an article that proved (at least on paper) something to the effect that damping factors in the tripple digits are farily useless (not negative, but not audible either)...someone correct me if i'm wrong
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 04:18 AM
  #18  
ChizzerZ24's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,417
Post

ahah yeah I know someone who is like " My subs are 1200 watt's peak" I keep tellin the douche you want rms not peak, peak kinda means nothing to you. Yet to this I think he still goes by peak on everything I guess it makes his stuff seem bigger/better [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:31 AM
  #19  
Starterwiz's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 870
Post

Those aren't Watts!!! Those are W's
And W's are only meaningful if you are driving a lightbulb!
RMS at the frequency you are using it for, with no more than x% distortion, into the load used is the only way to define your power.

And on another rant...why don't speakers come with distortion specs?
The old Altec Lansings used to claim 1% at 1 Watt, and they were IMHO one of the nicest sounding speakers I've ever used....Too bad their factory burned down!

[ November 18, 2004, 09:32 AM: Message edited by: Car Trek ]
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #20  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

Ah yes...speaker distortion. Well that's why I find THD such a laughable #....

I bet people would be surprised the degree with which even good drivers distort a signal.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.