Why do I have two 15" subwoofers?
10-14-2006, 09:38 AM
#11
50 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 322
Originally Posted by TLCCustoms
have you thought about droping down to 12's or 10's where you can get a bit more control
10-14-2006, 09:56 AM
#12
Why are people still saying that with smaller drivers you get better control? It's all in the box design and total system integration. Assuming your subs don't suck *** in general. 
I have 2 old Image Dynamics ID15s sealed in a small box each and they aren't far behind in comparison to IDQ i had, or the brahma or xxx.
I have 2 old Image Dynamics ID15s sealed in a small box each and they aren't far behind in comparison to IDQ i had, or the brahma or xxx.
Last edited by df.dima; 10-14-2006 at 09:59 AM.
10-14-2006, 09:59 AM
#13
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,855
There's nothing wrong with the gear. Kicker is a perfectly capable brand and 15s are certainly capable of world class SQ. Some of THE most successful cars run 15s.
I agree that your enclosure is way too big for SQ. At that volume I would expect flabby bloated bass that does not mesh with anything - kind of what you are describing.
I agree that your enclosure is way too big for SQ. At that volume I would expect flabby bloated bass that does not mesh with anything - kind of what you are describing.
10-14-2006, 11:36 AM
#14
Originally Posted by Lspade69
Here is a pic of the subs. The only thing different now is that there is no amp mount on the top and the amp is mounted to the back of the seat.
Time Aligning?
Amplifying Bandwidth? Lol
Low pass is at about 120 on amp
I don't think my subs are wired out of phase but it will never hurt to check. I will do that and let ya guys know.
I can't change the slope or crossover on the HU like I could with my old unit. It is at I think, 100hz.
Time Aligning?
Amplifying Bandwidth? Lol
Low pass is at about 120 on amp
I don't think my subs are wired out of phase but it will never hurt to check. I will do that and let ya guys know.
I can't change the slope or crossover on the HU like I could with my old unit. It is at I think, 100hz.
do you have the 2 subs in the same phase?
10-14-2006, 01:17 PM
#15
I checked out the response curves in winisd (to be fair to the brand since Iam talking smack)
5 cubes each looks fine to me.... Q is a bit on the low side for 'SQ' (about .71)... so I agree, try a smaller box....
5 cubes each looks fine to me.... Q is a bit on the low side for 'SQ' (about .71)... so I agree, try a smaller box....
10-14-2006, 02:08 PM
#17
50 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 152
making the box smaller gives the speakers a midbass rise in output and less deep bass output
this is not considered sq
its what our brain percieves as better
ideal q is .5 but most people don't prefer a flat responce
some people prefer a q closer to 1 or over which make the sound boomy and typically more midbass output
this is not considered sq
its what our brain percieves as better
ideal q is .5 but most people don't prefer a flat responce
some people prefer a q closer to 1 or over which make the sound boomy and typically more midbass output
10-14-2006, 02:53 PM
#18
"" Try taking the subs out of the enclosure and then putting a bunch of books or similar in there to take away some of the airspace and then see how you like the sound. ""
Wow, thats a good idea. When I get the time I am going to try it.
"" certainly capable of world class SQ. Some of THE most successful cars run 15s. ""
That makes lots of sense, I personally like the sound of 15's over 12's and stuff because of the "deeper" sound. But right now they sound sooo sloppy.
"" I agree that your enclosure is way too big for SQ. At that volume I would expect flabby bloated bass that does not mesh with anything - kind of what you are describing. ""
You described it perfectly. It sounds like the speakers are doing one song and the subwoofer is playing a different song.
"" making the box smaller gives the speakers a midbass rise in output and less deep bass output
this is not considered sq
its what our brain percieves as better
ideal q is .5 but most people don't prefer a flat responce
some people prefer a q closer to 1 or over which make the sound boomy and typically more midbass output ""
I didn't understand any of that. Lol, and I did not mean to sound offensive but that was too technical for me.
I was actually thinking of throwing my whole system away, lol. I hate it when my techno sounds like poop! I read about this dudes system a while ago. He ran a 5 channel Memphis amp with four polk audio speakers and one 10" image dynamics subwoofer. I think that would sound VERY good and I really don't care about loudness anymore. I just want something to jam out too. But if you guys think I can make it work I am deffinetly going for it.
Wow, thats a good idea. When I get the time I am going to try it.
"" certainly capable of world class SQ. Some of THE most successful cars run 15s. ""
That makes lots of sense, I personally like the sound of 15's over 12's and stuff because of the "deeper" sound. But right now they sound sooo sloppy.
"" I agree that your enclosure is way too big for SQ. At that volume I would expect flabby bloated bass that does not mesh with anything - kind of what you are describing. ""
You described it perfectly. It sounds like the speakers are doing one song and the subwoofer is playing a different song.
"" making the box smaller gives the speakers a midbass rise in output and less deep bass output
this is not considered sq
its what our brain percieves as better
ideal q is .5 but most people don't prefer a flat responce
some people prefer a q closer to 1 or over which make the sound boomy and typically more midbass output ""
I didn't understand any of that. Lol, and I did not mean to sound offensive but that was too technical for me.
I was actually thinking of throwing my whole system away, lol. I hate it when my techno sounds like poop! I read about this dudes system a while ago. He ran a 5 channel Memphis amp with four polk audio speakers and one 10" image dynamics subwoofer. I think that would sound VERY good and I really don't care about loudness anymore. I just want something to jam out too. But if you guys think I can make it work I am deffinetly going for it.
Last edited by Lspade69; 10-14-2006 at 02:56 PM.
10-14-2006, 03:15 PM
#19
The kickers will get slooppy if you overdrive them. If you put too much power into them and they stretch the surrounds. This also comes from having a box too big. They're still on sale for 98.00 us, so they're disposable.
I have the same kickers, I run them free air with an amp on each at 380 wrms and never max that out, so the kickers have never seen more than 350 wrms. I went with 15's for deeper smoother bass. I've been running them off the factory deck so far, but my interface just came in, so now i can install the alpine. Also, you said your crossover is at 120? Try about 80-85.
I have the same kickers, I run them free air with an amp on each at 380 wrms and never max that out, so the kickers have never seen more than 350 wrms. I went with 15's for deeper smoother bass. I've been running them off the factory deck so far, but my interface just came in, so now i can install the alpine. Also, you said your crossover is at 120? Try about 80-85.
