Final DQX test Results

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 19, 2004 | 04:44 PM

#11

Dereck Waller

Guest

Posts: n/a

I pretty much never eq dips up, they are almost always impossible to eq out. Bring down the humps maybe.

The only thing I have found an RTA useful for was finding out of polarity drivers, otherwise I tune totally by ear. the RTA is the debil!

Mar 19, 2004 | 05:30 PM

#12

Paul Niwranski

Guest

Posts: n/a

dukk@hotmail.com tough one eh [img]tongue.gif[/img]

yeah +/-3 is realistic in real time. My concern was that you wanted to be overall 'flat'. I've never seen a car sound decent that was EQ'd flat.

Mar 19, 2004 | 07:14 PM

#13

Number 2

1000 Watt CAFz'r

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Nov 2002

Posts: 1,890

Quote:

Originally posted by Dukk:
dukk@hotmail.com tough one eh [img]tongue.gif[/img]

yeah +/-3 is realistic in real time. My concern was that you wanted to be overall 'flat'. I've never seen a car sound decent that was EQ'd flat.

I think when he says flat he means "smooth". I've heard people say this before, but they just means there are no major +/- in the spectrum.
Either that or he wanted to EQ flat so the results of the test are easy to recognize.