General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

frequency response on HUs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 08:21 PM
  #41  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Originally Posted by kevmurray
Because it's easy to achieve, improves stability, and most importantly to the marketing department: bragging rights.
bingo

conversely just because a product doesn't claim HF extension out to microwave energy doesn't mean it isn't there (as it would scare away some folks thinking it will have too much HF energy). I do not think there is a universal answer and I wonder if the extended HF is shat or shinola.

a side note:
FM radio doesn't have good high frequency extension and you usually dont miss it... FM radio can be quite satisfying, until you hear the same song on CD and it seems so much brighter but with more depth and better image placement... (my magnum dynalab is BY FAR the best sounding radio I have ever heard and the missing 1/2 octave isn't terribly noticeable)
Old Feb 26, 2009 | 08:26 PM
  #42  
kevmurray's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 537
Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
I thought the lowest frequency was essentially called the fundamental frequency and that is basically the "note" that the instrument is playing. Then from there the higher frequencies are the harmonics. All of those together is what allows us to distinguish a piano note from a guitar. So I am not sure what you mean when you refer to lower harmonics.
There are few subharmonics in music since most instruments can't produce them.

Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
What kind of sound or instruments has harmonics that go past 20khz?
Violin maybe, cymbals probably, but distorted electric guitar most certainly. Is it captured on recordings though? Bells are known for subharmonics.

Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
Lastely, during the recording with instruments that have harmoniks past 20k, one would think that the original 20khz+ harmonics present would affect the audible ones belo 20k... why would it be important for those higher 20k+ harmonics to affect them again during replay with a home or car system?
Not sure what you're asking here but many people want their gear to be able to reproduce the ultrasonic range. Some believe it's perceptable, some just want it "because". I doubt if anyone has checked if their recorded music contains ultrasonic content. Standard CD is capable of 22kHz, DAT can do 24kHz and newer high sample rate recordings are capable of 48kHz. One interesting thing is many metal dome tweeters have a nasty break up mode just above 20kHz and we should be greatfull we can't hear the butchery.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 12:30 AM
  #43  
Sikk Nation's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 992
Originally Posted by defro13
i didnt miss it, i kept it simple for your sake based on the elementary terms you were using to help the original poster, and it didnt seem as though you understood or knew anything about harmonics by your previous posts either so i wanted to keep in plain and simple terms......glad to see you took my advice and googled it before reposting though.....
google is a wonderful tool although I've never used it to look up information on acoustics. I got most of my info from my good friend Penn who is a acoustical engineer, and from Elite car audio back in the late 90's.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #44  
maltesechicken's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
Is all of this banter really helpful to the OP?
As a newbie entering the hobby are these really the forefront technical details that need to be acquired first?
This is all theory . . . I would like someone to take a HU with a freq. response that tops out at 20,000Hz, and use it in a system with quality amps and speakers, then trade it out for an equally priced HU that does 24,000Hz or more. I doubt that anyone of us would actually HEAR a difference - yes there might be technical equipment that might notice a difference, but if a stereo is designed to sound good to a machine, something has really lost focus.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 10:33 AM
  #45  
Sikk Nation's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 992
this is why my original posts were simplified, until defro decided to add only critisims to the thread which are of less value than the highly technical acoustical theory explanations which apparently are needed in order to not be heckled by the peanut gallery of armchair experts.
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 11:12 AM
  #46  
maltesechicken's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,026
Fair enough explanation
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 07:04 PM
  #48  
Sikk Nation's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 992
well we should shake hands and I can wipe my tears on your shirt and we'll be square again okay?
Old Feb 27, 2009 | 07:34 PM
  #49  
AAAAAAA's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,010
Originally Posted by kevmurray
There are few subharmonics in music since most instruments can't produce them.
This doesn't seem to make sense.... maybe if you said it differently?

Violin maybe, cymbals probably, but distorted electric guitar most certainly. Is it captured on recordings though? Bells are known for subharmonics.
From what I have researched, seems like it is only cymbals. At least that is all I could find.


Not sure what you're asking here but
Forget this part as I must have miss read something initially.

However I was asking defro as like someone else has mentioned, he seems to have quite the chip on his shoulder, perhaps deserved, but little content is being provided here besides entertainement value that is.

His explanation of harmonics didn't make total sense to me especially when he says 5k has harmonics one octave above and below (and so on) when from my understanding if you are playing a 5k frequency or tone that's it ...and that's why it doesn't sound like an instrument (because there are no harmonics). When playing an instrument, the lowest harmonic is refered to as the fundamental and that there are no lower ones.
Old Feb 28, 2009 | 07:34 AM
  #50  
kevmurray's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 537
Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
This doesn't seem to make sense.... maybe if you said it differently? <snip>
From what I have read so far, no distinction has been made between pure tones and musical notes. As you mentioned tones do not have harmonics. No higher frequency harmonics (overtones) and no lower frequency harmonics (undertones or subharmonics). As far as I know there is no musical instrument (other than a synthesizer) that is capable of pure tones. All musical notes have harmonics and the vast majority are higher than the fundamental. There are very few instruments that are capable of harmonic content below the fundamental frequency.

As far as the original post goes, I don't believe it's necessary to have extension outside 20kHz. Especially considering most of us don't use a recording format that supports it. Amplifiers have extended range in order to maintain stability by pushing the Nyquist frequency well outside the amplifier bandwidth. CD players do not suffer from stability issues and therefore only need to be able to cover the frequency range supported by the recording format. Just my opinion of course.

CD: 22kHz
DAT: 24kHz
DVD audio: 48kHz-96kHz (depending on sampling frequency)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:25 PM.