HU effect
#43
Originally posted by Funkdoobiest:
I would bet that with the music the average user of this board listens to, in their vehicle, while in motion, wouldn't notice a difference between a $149 Sony and a $1000 Eclipse.
I would bet that with the music the average user of this board listens to, in their vehicle, while in motion, wouldn't notice a difference between a $149 Sony and a $1000 Eclipse.
Go into a box store, take 8 copies of one CD, play it in 8 different decks and set the volumes to all the same level, turn off all the eqs, and processing, then switch between them all......................just humor me, yourselves.........whoever............you won't hear it............
Anyone here can come to my store and I will set it up and I will bet $1000 you won't hear a difference.............
#44
Originally posted by Tim Baillie:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Funkdoobiest:
I would bet that with the music the average user of this board listens to, in their vehicle, while in motion, wouldn't notice a difference between a $149 Sony and a $1000 Eclipse.
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Funkdoobiest:
I would bet that with the music the average user of this board listens to, in their vehicle, while in motion, wouldn't notice a difference between a $149 Sony and a $1000 Eclipse.
Go into a box store, take 8 copies of one CD, play it in 8 different decks and set the volumes to all the same level, turn off all the eqs, and processing, then switch between them all......................just humor me, yourselves.........whoever............you won't hear it............
Anyone here can come to my store and I will set it up and I will bet $1000 you won't hear a difference............. </font>[/QUOTE]That's great.
When I listen to music on sound boards, I just take it for what it's worth because I"m not familiar with what it's supposed to sound like.
Of coarse you won't notice a difference if you only listen to it once on the board and then switch it with 8 different decks (that are relatively similar) and this is for a number of reasons.
For one.. a lot (if not all) of the decks are made in the same year... Some people only change their HU every 5 years or so. For instance...5 years ago some decks weren't even equipt with a 1bit d/a converter.. where as now there are 24bit dac's / lower impedence(duel digital etc). 2volt preouts that were maybe 1v... now there are what? 8v and in some cases 16v? (eclipse). And that's not mentioning better technology put into the decks as a whole.
If I went into a box store and listened to 8 different pioneers I probably wouldn't notice much of a difference because a lot of them are so similar...(unless you hooked up the p9 and compared it to a lower end deck or something) the biggest difference is in looks and options. Howe4ver, if you compared that 2v or 4vt pioneer to an eclipse with 8v and 24bitdac and you have a trained ear with a familiar system, you should be able to notice a difference.
I don't see how your experiment could even be valid. There are how many people in this thread alone that have stated they can notice a difference between decks in most cases (but not all). We can't all be wrong.
Problem is that we don't listen to our music in box stores, we listen to it in our cars on our own setups... everyday... for years...
You can't compare apples and oranges, it just doesn't work that way.
[ March 30, 2004, 01:33 AM: Message edited by: DaFeared ]
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
How does a 8v pre-out sound better than a 2v? Have you looked at the output voltage of high end home stuff? why do they sound good even though their output voltage is usually way way way lower than even the cheapest car deck?
In what way is a 24bit dac better sonically than a 1 bit?
You nailed the main point with this statement "Problem is that we don't listen to our music in box stores, we listen to it in our cars on our own setups", in your car with your setup, with the crappy recordingas everyone listens to (with the exception of Keith lol) you can not hear a difference.
Also the only way to hear differences is to switch quickly, the human brain is meant to compensate for bad sound by making it sound good so we don't all go insane. Ever have a friend that thought his system sounded awesome and you listened and thought it was crap, well if you lived with that system for any period of time your brain would adjust and it would start to sound good, scientific fact argue away
In what way is a 24bit dac better sonically than a 1 bit?
You nailed the main point with this statement "Problem is that we don't listen to our music in box stores, we listen to it in our cars on our own setups", in your car with your setup, with the crappy recordingas everyone listens to (with the exception of Keith lol) you can not hear a difference.
Also the only way to hear differences is to switch quickly, the human brain is meant to compensate for bad sound by making it sound good so we don't all go insane. Ever have a friend that thought his system sounded awesome and you listened and thought it was crap, well if you lived with that system for any period of time your brain would adjust and it would start to sound good, scientific fact argue away
#46
I spend 6 weeks away from my car at a time, so your above statement applies to me.
Yes I agree to some extent that you come to accept faults in the system over time. But, when a system sounds like crap to me, it eats away at me until I fix it.
Adam
Yes I agree to some extent that you come to accept faults in the system over time. But, when a system sounds like crap to me, it eats away at me until I fix it.
Adam
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Well there is always the 2% that doesn't fit in with the norm (of course everyone in the world thinks they are in the 2%). I think all the people with the crappy little cube speakers for home theater and computer sound, fall in the other 98%, they all think their crappy speakers sound good, because they adjusted to them.
#48
Okay what about the guy that kept losing by 10-15 points.. then changes his HU and then starts winning by 17 rather than losing by that much? You mean to say that it's all just luck? a coincidence? I think not.
Furthermore.. Why would SQ competetors even bother upgrading their HU's every year if the technology didn't improve SQ? Spending $1,000 +..... Why wouldn't we all just stick to 1990 $50 cheapo's??? (yes I know a lot of people upgrade for looks and features too)
My old pioneer didn't even have a 1 bit dac, and I upgraded to a 1 bit dac and I noticed the difference. It was a fair bit IMO. What about lower impedence? I'm not saying one little thing will make the sound noticable... it's everything combined.
Furthermore, I"m not arguing that you will notice a different sound between all decks... usually just decks that are reasonably far apart. technologially. (Or so I"ve noticed anyways)
Thats not all.. Back to the argument on CD's.. producers are getting better equiptment in order to record their music a lot better.. along with the improvement in HU technology such as dac's, lower impedence etc, one would have to at least be open to the suggestion that we are moving closer to being able to reproduce the studio recording the way it was intended to be heard...
But who knows.. maybe the 90% of us in here that truely believe there is a difference, are off our rockers.... if so I appologize... but at the same time, I know what I hear.
Furthermore.. Why would SQ competetors even bother upgrading their HU's every year if the technology didn't improve SQ? Spending $1,000 +..... Why wouldn't we all just stick to 1990 $50 cheapo's??? (yes I know a lot of people upgrade for looks and features too)
My old pioneer didn't even have a 1 bit dac, and I upgraded to a 1 bit dac and I noticed the difference. It was a fair bit IMO. What about lower impedence? I'm not saying one little thing will make the sound noticable... it's everything combined.
Furthermore, I"m not arguing that you will notice a different sound between all decks... usually just decks that are reasonably far apart. technologially. (Or so I"ve noticed anyways)
Thats not all.. Back to the argument on CD's.. producers are getting better equiptment in order to record their music a lot better.. along with the improvement in HU technology such as dac's, lower impedence etc, one would have to at least be open to the suggestion that we are moving closer to being able to reproduce the studio recording the way it was intended to be heard...
But who knows.. maybe the 90% of us in here that truely believe there is a difference, are off our rockers.... if so I appologize... but at the same time, I know what I hear.
#49
Originally posted by PEI330Ci:
I spend 6 weeks away from my car at a time, so your above statement applies to me.
Yes I agree to some extent that you come to accept faults in the system over time. But, when a system sounds like crap to me, it eats away at me until I fix it.
Adam
I spend 6 weeks away from my car at a time, so your above statement applies to me.
Yes I agree to some extent that you come to accept faults in the system over time. But, when a system sounds like crap to me, it eats away at me until I fix it.
Adam
#50
Originally posted by DaFeared:
Okay what about the guy that kept losing by 10-15 points.. then changes his HU and then starts winning by 17 rather than losing by that much? You mean to say that it's all just luck? a coincidence? I think not.
Okay what about the guy that kept losing by 10-15 points.. then changes his HU and then starts winning by 17 rather than losing by that much? You mean to say that it's all just luck? a coincidence? I think not.
Furthermore.. Why would SQ competetors even bother upgrading their HU's every year if the technology didn't improve SQ? Spending $1,000 +..... Why wouldn't we all just stick to 1990 $50 cheapo's??? (yes I know a lot of people upgrade for looks and features too)
My old pioneer didn't even have a 1 bit dac, and I upgraded to a 1 bit dac and I noticed the difference. It was a fair bit IMO. What about lower impedence? I'm not saying one little thing will make the sound noticable... it's everything combined.
Thats not all.. Back to the argument on CD's.. producers are getting better equiptment in order to record their music a lot better.. along with the improvement in HU technology such as dac's, lower impedence etc, one would have to at least be open to the suggestion that we are moving closer to being able to reproduce the studio recording the way it was intended to be heard...
But who knows.. maybe the 90% of us in here that truely believe there is a difference, are off our rockers.... if so I appologize...
but at the same time, I know what I hear.