General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

Speaker Recommendation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2005, 05:59 PM
  #31  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Icon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,357
Post

dude thats sweet, I haden't heard, wow nice to see they stand behind there gear, you have to respect that.
Icon is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 08:46 PM
  #32  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
AudioVault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 253
Post

Theres just one k!
AudioVault is offline  
Old 05-29-2005, 09:28 PM
  #33  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Tim Baillie.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,406
Post

Buy a good speaker, install it right............run the right amount of power to it with a clean signal and who needs a warranty.......................

I have a set of MB Q's that are over 10 years old and they are still going strong and I used to run 300w RMS to them all day long........................

If people have to sell a product on the merits of it's warranty I would be a little hesitant...........................KIA doesn't offer their huge warranty cause it's built like a BMW.................
Tim Baillie. is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 12:14 AM
  #34  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
mike bisson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,156
Post

Originally posted by JohnVroom:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />
That description sounds like a colored presentation, where there is simply too much engineering focus on frequency response and not on dynamics, detail, system impedance (Allison speakers, some KEF, some AR). That is typified as a smooth balance of HF, mids, and LF but a definite 'blah' flavor. Over damping, putting in too much sound treatment, over processing can all duplicate this.

Neutrality is a systematic feature where every recording is allowed to have its individual sound. The opposite of this is my old tubed CJ PV-5 preamp, it was a simply wonderful sounding preamp BUT every recording sounded rich, deep, warm, 3D... the CJ changed the sound to a romantic ideal sound. Remember some recordings are done poorly and sound lousy, the system should tell you that too. A neutral system should be as exciting, or dull, as the original recording.
</font>[/QUOTE]Could you please clearify something for me? I will assume that your mention of Allison, KEF and AR (do you mean the original designs by Allison/Kloss or the current AR branded products) was to praise their ability to reproduce with absolute fidelity (or "faithfulness" as translated from the original Italian word). Another note, but if you look at an Allison speaker -- specifically the tweeter, you will note that many of today's high end home and car audio tweeters (scan speak, alpine F#1, Vifa, etc) copy its design and intention.

To quote another great audio innovator (the late Mr. Walker of Quad) the best audio system would be "a straight wire with gain" thus neutrality just might be the most highly prized of characteristics if your quest is truly high fidelity.
mike bisson is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 05:24 PM
  #35  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,603
Post

Originally posted by JohnVroom:
Jason Gays Focals (proper installation is the key to all of these) have an incredible level of control and power over the entire bass and midbass region that is hard to believe.
LOL you like that eh?

FYI I helped build that car. Well, the first install, when he was all Kicker amps.

I still can't get enough of it, it's just funny what you were saying about the midbass because Harry Kimura seems to think differently.
Brandon is offline  
Old 06-01-2005, 10:03 PM
  #36  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
loudtdi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 628
Post

I agree with Tim on this one!
loudtdi is offline  
Old 06-02-2005, 07:25 PM
  #37  
Yankee
 
JohnVroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

Originally posted by Brandon:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by JohnVroom:
Jason Gays Focals (proper installation is the key to all of these) have an incredible level of control and power over the entire bass and midbass region that is hard to believe.
LOL you like that eh?

FYI I helped build that car. Well, the first install, when he was all Kicker amps.

I still can't get enough of it, it's just funny what you were saying about the midbass because Harry Kimura seems to think differently.
</font>[/QUOTE]The driver on the floor is the one I am speaking of in it's current setup, the driver disects the sound and shows off hte control, it may not work on Harrys music or Harrys volume level (but Harry and I like Bass). Remember I am talking about bass not sub-bass
JohnVroom is offline  
Old 06-02-2005, 07:48 PM
  #38  
Yankee
 
JohnVroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
Post

Could you please clarify something for me? I will assume that your mention of Allison, KEF and AR (do you mean the original designs by Allison/Kloss or the current AR branded products) was to praise their ability to reproduce with absolute fidelity (or "faithfulness" as translated from the original Italian word). Another note, but if you look at an Allison speaker -- specifically the tweeter, you will note that many of today's high end home and car audio tweeters (scan speak, alpine F#1, Vifa, etc) copy its design and intention.
Yes the inverted dome is 'in' again (Focal Be)

The Allison (late 70's) 'flush' mounted and AR (early 80's) sealed designs were both engineered to produce 'flat' in room responses. While the Allison was a bit of a fav of mine (till I heard Snell) it depended on room loading (like the Klipshhorn) to make bass. Different wall materials would make different bass (flawed but still good in most rooms) I would not call the effort one of high fidelity to the recorded sound … but I would call it good sound reproduction (they were not the best imaging speakers or even that accurate) but a darn solid effort to raise the bar. The AR on the other hand measured well but never (IMO) came close to sounding like music, it was like they designed the perfect loudspeaker on paper and never listened to it. I preferred the Advent and JBL offerings that were much closer to the timbre of live music to the AR. And believe me I fell in love with the appearance and engineering of the AR … I was SOLD on AR (till I heard it anyway). I also thought the mid 80’s KEF while measuring well sounded thin and ... like a plastic driver.

Kloss and Roy A. were visionaries and both took chances with radical designs. Each had hits and misses. Without the AR I disliked so much, we would be stuck listening to ported systems (that was for Dukk BTW). That was an interesting time where engineering efforts to produce good sound in the home were trying new things.

System neutrality and true musical detail are still the hardest things to achieve in reroduced sound.

[ June 02, 2005, 09:09 PM: Message edited by: JohnVroom ]
JohnVroom is offline  
Old 06-03-2005, 08:59 PM
  #40  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
mike bisson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,156
Post

John,

Interesting and well considered comments -- in my experience, I found the Allisons with the "inverted dome" tweeter to image rather nicely -- but perhaps that is a subjective evaluation on my part. I have to admit I am partial to the concept of free acoustic suspension (sorry Dukk) and perhaps that is why I am still partial to sealed boxes for SQ in many vehicles.
mike bisson is offline  


Quick Reply: Speaker Recommendation



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.