Symetrical Tuning
The main thing to remember is PL's are everything....speaker angles/height etc...don't mean crap unless your PL's are good.
The further you can get your speakers away from you, the better it's going to stage from both seats. ie: Mark Eldridge.
However back to the compromise thing, you can/will loose some tonality by doing this, although a good Parametric can make all the difference in the world.
The further you can get your speakers away from you, the better it's going to stage from both seats. ie: Mark Eldridge.
However back to the compromise thing, you can/will loose some tonality by doing this, although a good Parametric can make all the difference in the world.
Originally posted by Dukk:
Dukk prefers tonality to imaging so this is not a big deal to me.
Dukk prefers tonality to imaging so this is not a big deal to me.
I dunno, Tonality is pretty simple....play with angles and/or eq....plus good equipment to start with helps too.....soundstage takes some patience.
Guest
Posts: n/a
soundstage is the impression of width and depth, where image is the ralationship of perfromers in that soundstage and there stage presence. i agrree the relationship exists, but you can have one very good and hve the other bad, typically good soundstage but poor imaging. i heard tons of good to great soundstage with very poor imaging at the finals
Guest
Posts: n/a
neither can image and stage. i was lucky enough at the finals to be parked right beside anthony davis, ex world champion a few times, 2nd at finals this year, and learned a monumental amount about tuning techniques and the difference between image and stage. he is actaully the main board man for a bunch of live acts. i wish i had more time to talk to him but he was a busy guy
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Brandon:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dukk:
Dukk prefers tonality to imaging so this is not a big deal to me.
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Dukk:
Dukk prefers tonality to imaging so this is not a big deal to me.
I dunno, Tonality is pretty simple....play with angles and/or eq....plus good equipment to start with helps too.....soundstage takes some patience. </font>[/QUOTE]No, I never said that imaging is unimportant but when I listen to music that I really like, which I do more than listen to music that tries to point out technical flaws in the system, I want it to sound DAMN good.
To me tonality is key - and it's a lot harder than 'playing with an EQ' to achieve great tonality.
Very close in importance to tonality is staging because, simply, it is annoying to have the performers stackup in one spot.
Finally, I look at imaging as it's the hardest to 'play' with and also the easiest to manipulate with the mind and the eye. Yeah this may be the "Holy Grail" of audio competition but I pay little attention to it when I listen to the system everyday - and honestly, if I place two people 3 feet apart, 20 feet and 23 feet away, it's easy to tell which one is on the left and on the right but ****ing hard to tell which one is farther away so to me it's the least important. [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
Your experience may vary.
Guys, I'm just amazed at how much a person can tune the sound of his system by playing with settings and positioning.
So far, I'm finding much better response with my midrange drivers for both 1 seat and 2 seat tuning by having them within 30 degrees off axis of the listener. I tried firing them approximately towards the shifter, and while it was pleasant and equal from both seats, music didn't sound as real. Again, this is ONLY with my drivers. The funny thing is, that the more on-axis I point the drivers, the more sensitive to time alignment they are.
I'm not giving up on 2 seat tuning, but right now I've got one honey of a sweet spot for one seat.
Loving the music...which is ultimately what it's all about.
Adam
So far, I'm finding much better response with my midrange drivers for both 1 seat and 2 seat tuning by having them within 30 degrees off axis of the listener. I tried firing them approximately towards the shifter, and while it was pleasant and equal from both seats, music didn't sound as real. Again, this is ONLY with my drivers. The funny thing is, that the more on-axis I point the drivers, the more sensitive to time alignment they are.
I'm not giving up on 2 seat tuning, but right now I've got one honey of a sweet spot for one seat.
Loving the music...which is ultimately what it's all about.
Adam


