General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

What's Next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2004 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
islandphile's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,120
Post

A sensible, logical theory Adam. I wonder it it would work out in the real world...

Does any speaker manufacturer utilize this technique now? Also wonder has Focal tuned each speaker cone ie the Utopia line depending on weather it's a 4 or 6 and so forth...I would think the cone is physically thicker on the Utopia subs???
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 06:34 AM
  #14  
PEI330Ci's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Post

Hi Dave,

That's pretty cool about the Kicker mids, I've never even looked at them.....
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:39 PM
  #16  
Brandon's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,603
Post

Originally posted by PEI330Ci:

To date, there are very few 6” midranges that can reach above 3khz with good off axis response and low distortion. Of those, very few can accurately reproduce good dynamic response in the midbass region due the limits of their suspensions. I think it’s possible, using the varying foam core technique, to increase the upper limits of frequency response while maintaining good midbass extension.
Adam
Man, that's right on the money.

When I read that I instantly thought of the Focal Audiom 6W because what you said there, Adam, is a deadly accurate discription of that driver.

While the 6W can very accuratly produce frequencies above 3K, it's midbass extension sucks. Even Focal doesn't recomend using this driver without a midbass driver that can play some of the higher frequncies, such as the 5WS.

I have however, heard 1 driver that I thought, did a very good job of accuratly playing over 3K and also having decent midbass extension, and that driver is the 165K2.

Midbass output was,I thought, lacking yet not absent. But it was a very fast and accurate driver even above 3K. Also, like I said, the midbass was there, but output was a tad lacking.

Anyway, very well spoken paragraph Adam. I agree 100% with that.
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:58 PM
  #17  
Brandon's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,603
Post

Dave, in regards to the Polk LSi9's.

I have never really more than glanced at Polk let alone considered them a high-end speaker manufacturer although I confess I have never heard a Polk speaker before.

You said you were very happy with them considering the price. Can people expect more to come from "mainstream" audio companies? Also, what do you think so called "high-end" companies will do to make thier products even better.

Also, can CCA, look forward to an exclusive review of the LSi9's
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #18  
hobbes26's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 146
Post

Adding too much foam will increase the cone’s mass and lower the drivers high frequency output. (causes the driver’s response to roll off earlier)
Mass does not affect high-frequency rolloff. It extends the low frequency extension and decreases overall efficiency of the driver.

In that respect, I don't see why you just make the cone as rigid as possible without care for mass (raising the resonance frequency way past the bandwidth you want), and just push it with a LOT of power... Do we really need high efficiency? (barring use of tube amps)

There's not just the cone and surround damping to consider. There's lots of play with the cone edge and surround geometry as well.

Dustcaps also affect the rigidity of the cone, as well as changing the resonance frequencies through different boundary conditions.

[ November 28, 2004, 11:40 PM: Message edited by: hobbes26 ]
Old Nov 30, 2004 | 07:23 AM
  #20  
TomK's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,649
Post

Never heard the Polks, but I agree with Dave to a degree. Get a really decent set of drivers by doing your homework.

Then put the time into the install. You usually kill the guys with the high end mega buck drivers or worst case have 95% of what they have for a fraction of the price. I've seen this and judged it quite a few times now. Always brinsg a smile to my face.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 PM.