Which would you rather use
#22
Originally posted by loudtdi:
Now its getting stupid!
Now its getting stupid!
in my work ,some of the best things are stupid ideas ,that work the best
[img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
#24
Originally posted by dumbest:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by loudtdi:
Now its getting stupid!
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by loudtdi:
Now its getting stupid!
in my work ,some of the best things are stupid ideas ,that work the best
[img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img] </font>[/QUOTE]Bout once a year i shave my sort & curlies and stuff them in the box.
The accusticness of the subs is awesome!
Only took 12 years
Is that stupid enuf? [img]graemlins/headbang.gif[/img]
#28
When it comes to fiber deterioration, I'd have to say that synthetics will break up faster than natural fibre. The reason I say that is because i just opened up a pair of 40 year old speakers, and found a white almost powder like substance that accumilated on the back of the magnet, the insulation was white Dakron. Wool fiber has been excavated in many archeological digs, and despite being broken up by impacted sand, it was still intact.
Absorption rate is a moote point, but the only advantage that synthetics will have IMO .
Note to MODS. Please delete any irrelevant posts in this thread. TYVM
Absorption rate is a moote point, but the only advantage that synthetics will have IMO .
Note to MODS. Please delete any irrelevant posts in this thread. TYVM
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Whippet
Enclosure Design & Construction Help
0
12-27-2009 01:25 PM
TravisB
Enclosure Design & Construction Help
6
05-11-2006 03:09 PM