Off-topic Chat For everything unrelated to car audio. Jokes, stories, videos etc within.

320 Bit rate compared to CD

Old May 31, 2011 | 09:05 AM
  #1  
d4rin's Avatar
Thread Starter
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 849
320 Bit rate compared to CD

Yes...This discussion again.

Now I find when I crank up my fronts loud with a 320 but rate MP3, I find it the sound will start to break up a lot quicker than a CD. I don't know if I have magical ears or anything but when it's up loud it does not sound as crisp as a CD. Some people say they can't tell the difference between MP3 and a CD, But I believe it also depends on the speakers. If you use your computer speakers you won't be able to tell the difference because they are most likely digital speakers.

Anyone else think I am crazy? Or can you tell th difference too?
Old May 31, 2011 | 09:54 AM
  #2  
jstoner22's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 846
i hear a difference, especially when not driving.

what are digital speakers?
Old May 31, 2011 | 11:58 AM
  #3  
d4rin's Avatar
Thread Starter
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 849
Originally Posted by jstoner22
i hear a difference, especially when not driving.

what are digital speakers?
Sorry, I just ment PC speakers .
Old Jun 2, 2011 | 08:09 PM
  #4  
Rob's Avatar
Rob
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,417
I can hear the difference.
Old Jun 3, 2011 | 01:09 AM
  #5  
DaVibe's Avatar
Level 1 Supporter
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,261
Don't they refer to 320 as a "CD-Quality" MP3?

I'd have to do a comparison to see if I can tell ... if someone had a mp3 and I had the same track on CD, I don't know, considering how close 320 is suppose to be / is.

192 is a different story, but 320 is suppose to be the clear of the clear.
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 02:55 PM
  #6  
XxunfazedxX's Avatar
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 15
Ya I notice a difference between the two aswell.
Old Jun 14, 2011 | 10:05 PM
  #7  
Dammed's Avatar
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 11
CD quality is about 1400 kbit/s, so CD can transfer about 4,5 times more data then 320 MP3.

But honestly, if you listen to crappy speakers, 320 is more then good enough. My favourite music is stored as flac (CD quality) but I have many songs with 320 kbit/s MP3 and it sounds pretty good.

But I can hear without any doubt if it's cd quality or 320 kbit/s MP3 on my speakers, and most carstereos.
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 05:15 PM
  #8  
link2009's Avatar
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 22
You guys are comparing apples with oranges.

320 CBR (Constant bit rate) is technically inferior to lossless PCM data. Lossless PCM data can be found on CDs since WAV files are lossless.

Personally, I have a HUGE FLAC collection and I can rarely tell the difference between lossless vs lossy.

d4rin, what are you playing the MP3s off of? A CD player uses your headunit's DAC, a USB or AUX input will not (in most cases, iPod exempted).
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 06:01 PM
  #9  
Diskro's Avatar
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 9
Theres not much difference in sound quality
Old Jun 20, 2011 | 07:32 PM
  #10  
BradSk88's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 217
It really depends on who recorded it. Obviously you'll hear a lot more detail if you're listening to audiophile tracks, but if you're listening to rap, pop or rock you likely won't hear it unless the audio engineer really cared.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:07 AM.