Another Question for FS guys...or others lol

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 19, 2004 | 12:30 PM

#11

Paul Niwranski

Guest

Posts: n/a

Well I figure you may as well maximize your system. Why cripple it with a sealed enclosure [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]

Jul 20, 2004 | 10:12 AM

#12

noid_19

50 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 192

Quote:

Originally posted by Dukk:
Well I figure you may as well maximize your system. Why cripple it with a sealed enclosure [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]

we could argue about this all day. I agree a ported box can kick ***, if its designed to proper specs, but too often people just toss them into a generic pre-fab ported box and it ends up sounding like crap. I like sealed boxes more myself, saves trunk space and tight clean response. if your all about max boom then port it.

Jul 20, 2004 | 12:20 PM

#13

Paul Niwranski

Guest

Posts: n/a

The single advantage sealed has is the size of the enclosure itself. A minor sacrifice for all the benefits of a vented enclosure IMO.

Jul 20, 2004 | 02:25 PM

#14

HyundaiGuyMTX

Thread Starter

50 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 295

great so back to my question lol...Isnt it bad to hook up 2 SVC 4 ohm subs to a two channel amplifier? this would rule out the 400.2

Jul 20, 2004 | 04:34 PM

#15

Paul Niwranski

Guest

Posts: n/a

I would avoid 2 ohm mono operation.

Jul 22, 2004 | 09:11 AM

#16

MitekCAKyle

50 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: Apr 2003

Posts: 150

Yes the 4002 should not be ran at 2ohm. If you are buy 2 MZS 10" buy the 4001. The other alternative is to buy a 1 single MXS with a 4002 4 ohm mono.!!

Good luck.

Jul 23, 2004 | 09:15 AM

#17

HyundaiGuyMTX

Thread Starter

50 Watt CAFz'r

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 295

Well looks like the 4001 is falling right into my budget. It just dropped to 349.99 today and thats not sale price. Maybe i'll just go with it. It wont hurt my subs anyway.