General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

bought a new amp, I feel I was mislead

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2007, 06:14 PM
  #11  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
ufknrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 32
It could also depend on the sub(s) you are running them with, and what impedance they are presenting to the amp
ufknrun is offline  
Old 12-26-2007, 06:16 PM
  #12  
MTT
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (17)
 
MTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,325
Originally Posted by ufknrun
It could also depend on the sub(s) you are running them with, and what impedance they are presenting to the amp
the birth sheet says 351@ 2 Ohm, box outside says 900 watts...has nothing to do with the subs at this point.
MTT is offline  
Old 12-26-2007, 06:20 PM
  #13  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
ufknrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 32
Even if he was trying to run a pair of 12W7's?
ufknrun is offline  
Old 12-26-2007, 06:37 PM
  #14  
MTT
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (17)
 
MTT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,325
Originally Posted by ufknrun
Even if he was trying to run a pair of 12W7's?
not looking for a pissing match here but it doesn't matter if he's planning to run 14 of the JL 13w7's at this point, he hasn't told us or asked us about subs of any type. He's just asking about the discrepancy between marketing and reality of that particular amp, and feeling screwed by it.

if it has a birthsheet rated for 351@2-Ohm then chances are thats the lowest impedance it can safely operate at so lower impedances (like 1.5 in your example) become irrelevant.

If the OP has of asked why his subs don't seem to be getting the 900 watts advertised, then we can jump all over the impedance of the subs suggestions.
MTT is offline  
Old 12-26-2007, 06:48 PM
  #15  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
ufknrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 32
Not looking for a pissing match either. I was referring to Z's comments about the RF amp being weak (off topic now I apologize to the OP)
ufknrun is offline  
Old 12-26-2007, 07:59 PM
  #16  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
Z Trip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14
Ok guys calm down. LOL. My box is half a cubic foot, ported aspenite box with a 10" JBL sub that has been placed upside down. Its brached to the sub. But maybe its beause I branched it wrong. I'm still pretty new to all this....

Z
Z Trip is offline  
Old 12-27-2007, 12:08 AM
  #17  
0 Watt CAFz'r
 
MSW Danny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 17
you bought a 300w amp. return it and get your money back if you can
MSW Danny is offline  
Old 12-27-2007, 08:37 AM
  #18  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Haunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
^ Agreed.. if you bought it at a retail store you should be able to return it...


Also .5 cubes sounds pretty small for a ported box ?!
Haunz is offline  
Old 12-27-2007, 10:42 AM
  #19  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Toddyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 709
And aspenite no way build a new box to proper spec using MDF
Toddyboy is offline  
Old 12-27-2007, 07:25 PM
  #20  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
Trance-Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by MSW Danny
you bought a 300w amp. return it and get your money back if you can
ya, I'm going to have to return it, the sub I have is a 10" Infinity Perfect sub, I can not remember exactly how many watts it can handle, I have been trying to look it up, but I believe it can handle just over 1000w, so a little peice of 300w amp won't really do the trick
Trance-Canada is offline  


Quick Reply: bought a new amp, I feel I was mislead



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 AM.