DLS whats with them?
06-14-2004, 07:23 AM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
As far as Scott Buwalda's car being bright, I disagree. I listened to it at Iasca finals last year and it was the smoothest sounding car at the show.
It had the best tonality of any car I listened to and if I had to pick a fault with it it would be in the imaging width department, which I would assume is because of the relocated seats.
It had the best tonality of any car I listened to and if I had to pick a fault with it it would be in the imaging width department, which I would assume is because of the relocated seats.
06-14-2004, 08:03 AM
#43
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
So I'm supposed to "disapear" a while then?
Not gonna happen, bring on the "hits"!!
Dereck, that's interesting what you said about width. While many people equalize pathlengths by pushing the seat waaaay back, they are also narrowing the angles of reception. Width naturaly is defined by this. I think in general, cars that achieve good width with the seats back, have the help of relective surfaces on the side of the car. Just something to think about....
I found better imaging in my car with the seats midway through the selection of travel.
Adam
Not gonna happen, bring on the "hits"!!
Dereck, that's interesting what you said about width. While many people equalize pathlengths by pushing the seat waaaay back, they are also narrowing the angles of reception. Width naturaly is defined by this. I think in general, cars that achieve good width with the seats back, have the help of relective surfaces on the side of the car. Just something to think about....
I found better imaging in my car with the seats midway through the selection of travel.
Adam
06-14-2004, 08:17 AM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
With Scott's car in "listening mode" you can't get anywhere near the pedals, and I'm 6'1". I know that Mark would hate the car for that but other than a sacrifice in width Scott's car is the best I have heard to date. When you improve one thing in a car many times you will degrade something else, it's a balance of trade offs.
06-14-2004, 10:34 AM
#45
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,783
Dereck, considering I've never actually heard any of the top SQ cars, I probably am not qualified to speak of imaging in a car.
It is possible that Scott's car could make mine sound like an AM radio when compared side to side.
Some day I've got to git me to one of deeez IAZZZZKa thingys
It is possible that Scott's car could make mine sound like an AM radio when compared side to side.
Some day I've got to git me to one of deeez IAZZZZKa thingys
06-14-2004, 11:07 AM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have heard many cars that had way better width than Scott's car, but his sounds best to me because of it's tonality. It's great to have imaging and staging, but without tonality and sounding real, what's the point? I think most of the old school people on here will agree with that!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
