General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Eclipse 3424 vs. 3434 sound quality?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2005 | 02:05 PM
  #1  
effenay's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 172
Post

I'm hoping that some of you guys who are familiar with the Eclipse 2004 line-up can answer this question.

I bought an Eclipse 3424 in January and have been pretty happy with it. Recently I picked up a 3434 at a great price to try out. It has several user interface issues that really annoy me, so the only reason that I would keep this deck over my 3424 is sound quality.

Unfortunately, my system is still in progress (lots of components in boxes waiting to be installed), so I can't hear any SQ difference between the two decks myself right now.

Is the 3434 superior to the the 3424 as far as sound quality is concerned? Thanks in advance for your comments and advice.

Eclipse 3424


Eclipse 3434
Old Apr 23, 2005 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
MR2NR's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,420
Post

Both cd players have the exact same internals, from pre-amp, to laser transport to tuner. The internal amplifier is a little different and of course the drop down face and feature content for it.
Old Apr 23, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #3  
effenay's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 172
Post

Thanks for the reply. In your opinion, would any of the differences between the two models result in an audible improvement in SQ when using external amps?

I dug out my 2004 Eclipse brochure and noticed that it lists the following differences between the 3434 and 3424:

- The 3434 has MOSFET amplification while the 3424 does not

- Stereo separation 80dB vs 76dB

- S/N ratio 95dB vs. 90dB

- Dynamic range 95dB vs. 90dB

- THD 0.01% vs. 0.02%

- Tone controls +12dB vs. +10dB

Are these figures just marketing numbers to help differentiate the products, or is there any truth to this?

Basically I'm trying to determine if there is any SQ advantage for the 3434 over the 3424.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 12:12 AM
  #4  
Westec's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,448
Post

no, MR2NR is right...the 3434 has 4 volt preouts, where the 3424 has 1.8 volts. My figures might be off, but I'm sure I am right.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #6  
MR2NR's Avatar
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,420
Post

No advantage to using the CD3434 over the CD3424 in a fully amplified system.
(unless Westec has insider information that we don't know or were not made aware of which somehow seems unlikely).
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #7  
effenay's Avatar
Thread Starter
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 172
Post

Thanks for the replies guys, very much appreciated
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:54 PM
  #8  
Mattx's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 52
Post

Just a question about the eclipse decks, I am thinking of getting one. My concern is that i really like the sub control features on the pioneer decks. Do the new eclipse decks have selectable cut off frequencies for sub ?
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 06:03 PM
  #9  
AudioVault's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 253
Post

Yes depending on what model cd 5435 is one of them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kool
General Discussion
25
Aug 9, 2005 08:27 AM
audioconcepts
General SQ
18
Apr 15, 2005 07:52 AM
Scott Buwalda
General Discussion
47
Apr 6, 2005 07:35 PM
Martin
General Discussion
6
Oct 7, 2004 03:13 AM
2 8's AKA Jeepbeats
General Discussion
6
Jun 9, 2004 10:11 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.