Gettin My Sub Installed!
11-18-2004, 11:02 PM
#23
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 351
I have heard many positive reviews about people using tri-mode setups.. this place even installed a few and said the customers were quite happy.. the only people i hear saying not to go with it are ones that just base thier info on pure facts and no trial / error.
11-19-2004, 12:01 AM
#25
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 351
anyways I have been thinkin more about It I might just scrap the tri-mode idea and just power the front's off the hu and give all 150x1 rms to the sub... the specs on it are 150w rms long life use.. 200 w rms .. and 400 peak.. would I risk damaging by underpowering them if the rms is at 200?
11-19-2004, 02:54 AM
#26
Originally posted by MaNiC!:
Beam riders has a JVC deck with MP3 for the same price so he is not cutting you a deal and using a passive on a sub is not a good idea same with the tri mode set up. See how many people here use a Tri mode.
Beam riders has a JVC deck with MP3 for the same price so he is not cutting you a deal and using a passive on a sub is not a good idea same with the tri mode set up. See how many people here use a Tri mode.
11-19-2004, 09:18 AM
#27
500 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 870
Why does everyone here say Tri-mode sux?
First: you can have 40/ch for highs, and 150 for bass, but NOT at the same time! If you are using all your watts(150) playing bass, then an additional 80 added to it will cause your amp to clip. so you will only be able to get about 1/2 the power out of your amp (a 3dB loss)
Second:With a bi-amped system, you can "overdrive" your sub amp up to around 5% distortion, and get up to nearly double the power.With no highs connected to the amp, this distortion is inaudible. (This equals about a 3dB gain.)
Third: The Passive crossover you are buying for $10 will be probably 18ga wire, and will lose about 3dB.
Add it all up and the Bi-amp is about 9 dB louder (nearly twice as loud)as the Tri-mode setup, or the eqivalent of 8 times as much power. (each 3 dB change doubles the power required)
First: you can have 40/ch for highs, and 150 for bass, but NOT at the same time! If you are using all your watts(150) playing bass, then an additional 80 added to it will cause your amp to clip. so you will only be able to get about 1/2 the power out of your amp (a 3dB loss)
Second:With a bi-amped system, you can "overdrive" your sub amp up to around 5% distortion, and get up to nearly double the power.With no highs connected to the amp, this distortion is inaudible. (This equals about a 3dB gain.)
Third: The Passive crossover you are buying for $10 will be probably 18ga wire, and will lose about 3dB.
Add it all up and the Bi-amp is about 9 dB louder (nearly twice as loud)as the Tri-mode setup, or the eqivalent of 8 times as much power. (each 3 dB change doubles the power required)
11-19-2004, 12:03 PM
#28
500 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
I will state that it will not make any sense for you to use Tri-mode with an amp that is 40x2. Especially if you are concerned about transient response.
You would have to have one hell of an effiecient woofer. I am not familiar with the cadence in question?
And like Haunz said the box.
Like I said before... Deck power and bridge the amp for the sub.
And my old soundstream that I was not happy with in tri-mode was 125x2 500x1
[img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
You would have to have one hell of an effiecient woofer. I am not familiar with the cadence in question?
And like Haunz said the box.
Like I said before... Deck power and bridge the amp for the sub.
And my old soundstream that I was not happy with in tri-mode was 125x2 500x1
[img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hi..i'm new
General Discussion
33
12-28-2005 11:48 PM
