How much Difference ?
#35
#38
I dont think you made a mistake. It seems all makes call it collectively time allignment, even though they may be utilizing a different concept.
p.s. Perhaps a wrong choice for words when I called Eclipse T.A. crappy. Other makes use the same concept and some people like the results and may even prefer it over time delay, I however like time delay better, and if I really need fader type settings due to possible really big size of the vehicle, a fader may be used.
p.s. Perhaps a wrong choice for words when I called Eclipse T.A. crappy. Other makes use the same concept and some people like the results and may even prefer it over time delay, I however like time delay better, and if I really need fader type settings due to possible really big size of the vehicle, a fader may be used.
Last edited by Sasha; 11-26-2008 at 11:47 AM.
#39
can you explain how it's different? Eclipse's 7200II manual describes and demonstrates their T/A the same way as my Alpine PXA-h701. There may be differences in their increments or specific features, but the T/A as far as I can see, works the same way by delaying the closest speakers using time...not by fading (intensity).
#40
can you explain how it's different? Eclipse's 7200II manual describes and demonstrates their T/A the same way as my Alpine PXA-h701. There may be differences in their increments or specific features, but the T/A as far as I can see, works the same way by delaying the closest speakers using time...not by fading (intensity).
Did you not read the thread carefully where I said I was not sure about the 7200 model, I was referring to older models. Do you need more explanation?