General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

New SPL driver from Mach 5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2007, 06:17 PM
  #31  
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
FusionMadsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 883
Originally Posted by Prolifik
for $400 i'd look at FI or even Atomic
How about L7?
FusionMadsen is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 06:40 PM
  #32  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (7)
 
Prolifik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,180
L7's are good as long as u dont hammer more than 1500 rms into each
Prolifik is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 06:58 PM
  #33  
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
wasted911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,285
Originally Posted by Prolifik
u should quit while u are not too far behind
well the speaker was invented in 1876... so everything else is really just 131 years behind...

Also, the RE MT doesnt have a vented pole-piece.. Why is it such a big player in SPL?
wasted911 is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 08:02 PM
  #34  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Blaine Korte's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 238
Originally Posted by wasted911
well the speaker was invented in 1876... so everything else is really just 131 years behind...

Also, the RE MT doesnt have a vented pole-piece.. Why is it such a big player in SPL?
OMG You said RE. Yuli's going to tell you its the new JL and that you're a moron!!

Saying a specific driver sucks because it doesnt have a vented pole piece is like saying a specific driver sucks because it doesnt have the leads woven into the spider. Its just a different driver with a different design.

That said, I like when drivers do have vented pole pieces but is it really that big of a deal!? nooooo
Blaine Korte is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 08:53 PM
  #35  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
ShockingCanada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,287
...

yes the RE MT is an SPL woofer with no pole vent...this is supposed to be a SQL daily driver woofer not a SPL woofer so the cooling demands are differant since in SPL power is applied for 1 second. Of course this woofer does look pretty similar to an MT to me...don't know why they are saying its SQL and not SPL.
ShockingCanada is offline  
Old 11-03-2007, 01:18 AM
  #36  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Ligeia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 190
Originally Posted by wasted911
well the speaker was invented in 1876... so everything else is really just 131 years behind...

Also, the RE MT doesnt have a vented pole-piece.. Why is it such a big player in SPL?
Neither does the BTL and if you ask Scott why the other RE and Fi drivers have pole vents, it's because they needed to take steel out of the motor to avoid over-motoring the drivers.
Ligeia is offline  
Old 11-03-2007, 10:45 AM
  #37  
Administrator
 
Dukk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,855
Lightbulb

MTX drivers don't have pole vents and they make a pretty capable daily driver woofer. They have vents above the top plate for air flow. JL doesn't use pole vents either except in the W7 line.

IMO it's just what the designer chooses to go with
Dukk is offline  
Old 11-03-2007, 12:13 PM
  #38  
MTA
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
MTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,282
either way you look at it..its an MT woofer with a different dust cap

mts can take a load of power even without the vent... mine did 3.5mins at 5kw +
MTA is offline  
Old 11-03-2007, 01:25 PM
  #39  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
veeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
there's always more than one way to build something properly...if there wasn't, they would all look the same!
veeman is offline  


Quick Reply: New SPL driver from Mach 5



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 PM.