8" + 8" = 12"
Yeah. the lighter the cone...the quicker it can get to point a from point be and back again. with a light cone you can make a complete sound wave with less power. And thus also making a lighter cone have the ability to play a broader range of frequencies with less effort. I think anyway??
Thats good that i have been corrected about the 8 being able to play low. i will have to try out some different models rather than basing my assumption on one occasion. Thanks [img]smile.gif[/img]
Thats good that i have been corrected about the 8 being able to play low. i will have to try out some different models rather than basing my assumption on one occasion. Thanks [img]smile.gif[/img]
Wow, thanks for the lowdown boys... after all this I think I'm gonna go with a sealed 12.
I also did some searching on the net and there are some impressive 8 setups, but it looks like you really have to know what you're doing to get them to be competitive with the bigger cones power-wise.
So as usual, I'll take the easy way out.
I also did some searching on the net and there are some impressive 8 setups, but it looks like you really have to know what you're doing to get them to be competitive with the bigger cones power-wise.
So as usual, I'll take the easy way out.
Originally posted by defro13:
would a heavier mass not make it slower and therefore affecting its ability to be fast like a midrange should be, im not questioning, just asking a question
would a heavier mass not make it slower and therefore affecting its ability to be fast like a midrange should be, im not questioning, just asking a question
http://www.adireaudio.com/Files/Tech...ooferSpeed.pdf



