General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

The K2P is finally here! Pics..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2007, 12:49 PM
  #131  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Starterwiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 870
I just finished a set of Polk Momo's in the doors of an older Cavalier.

The original speakers (Fusions) were installed on a simple baffle somewhat like yours.
I made a baffle/spacer to seal up the door panel and the difference is remarkable.

You mentioned earlier that you could "feel" the bass on the door panel. That's the clue that the energy is wasted moving the panel, and causing all kinds of phase issues.

The Momo's don't have that much more bass than the Fusions in the board, but the difference with and without the baffle treatment is easily twice the bass.
And the door panels don't vibrate either.

It took me about 2 1/2 hrs and a bit of material to make....a far cry from 1200.

I'll try to get some pics up later.
Starterwiz is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 01:20 PM
  #132  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
SUX 2BU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,351
Perhaps too an even easier, more cost effective method to get the speaker output to not be lost in the gap between the speaker and the door panel is to use some closed cell foam around the edge of the speaker roughly the same thickness as the gap. This would effectively prevent the sound waves from escaping through the gap and also prevent unwanted vibrations from still reaching the panel if a harder spacer like one made of MDF would transmit to the door panel if it touches it. In fact I've seen factory door speaker installations do this.
SUX 2BU is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 01:47 PM
  #133  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Starterwiz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 870
Foam works if the space is close...I add foam to the MDF spacers as well.

Virually anything will work if it can block some air pressure....Beads of silicone, bodo, etc....just stay clear of anything that will sag or rum in warm weather like dum dum, although it works well too if you wrap it with tape or cloth.

A pound of plasticene can be had for a couple of bucks, and it will work very well to test and see if there's a difference.

Working "blind" inside the door, you need to be careful that nothing gets squished into the speaker surround, so a test fit with the plasticine is very helpful.
Starterwiz is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 03:15 PM
  #134  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
syang3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 107
Does that mean anything that can act as air blocker between the speaker and the gap will work right? Does it need to be accoustic foam or any closed cell foam will work? I will probably go with the closed cell foam cuz with plasticine it's kinda messy..well, it depends which one I can get easier and faster. Where can I get plasticine and closed cell foam from?
syang3 is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 03:24 PM
  #135  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
SweetnLow91SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 884
i wouldn't use plasticine mainly of the properties. closed cell foam is a much better material for sealing... i bellieve Home Depot or most hardware place should have them. would you know how big the gap is?
SweetnLow91SC is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 03:24 PM
  #136  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
syang3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 107
Originally Posted by SweetnLow91SC
Its quite a bit different sounding…

In Clip 1. (#4)

- the highs seems quieter, tonally is slightly better.
- the midwoofer seems to pick up energy around 250hz. (maybe from the deflex pad) but transient attack is a bit duller then clip 3. Overall has a fuller sound.

i would prefer the Focal Plain Chant over the Deflex for treatment tho.

,
High is definitely better, it doesn't hurt my ears now.

BTW, deflex pad is only installed one the driver side, I will install the other door when I got time.

How well does Focal plain chant work? I am guessing it's probably a lot more $$$.
syang3 is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:34 PM
  #137  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
syang3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 107
I bought some thick closed foam tape today and put them around the baffle to create a seal between panel.




Installed on the driver side door. Panel needs to be pushed a bit to mount back in.


After I put the panel back and listen for couple minutes, I can say that it didn't help. I can not hear any difference in bass between left and right channel....


I also bought a nylon fastener to try out differenct tweeter locations:



and some wires


A pillar:


On the dash:


Near woofer (simulate kick panel location)


So far I like the dash better. Near woofer was ok too but image was kinda strange, vocals high up on the dash while guitar, drums are below and seems coming from the floor...Hish is smoother on the dash than any other location .
syang3 is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 10:56 PM
  #138  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
zzzzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
have you tried on the apiller about 4" up off the dash?
zzzzzzz is offline  
Old 03-01-2007, 11:48 PM
  #139  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
syang3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 107
no, but will do later.
syang3 is offline  
Old 03-02-2007, 12:14 AM
  #140  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
SweetnLow91SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 884
Originally Posted by syang3
How well does Focal plain chant work? I am guessing it's probably a lot more $$$.
Quite well actually..... less dynamic constraint overall, and no noticeble energy storage.

i believe they're about $100/box of 8. some cars only needs 4. (2 per side)

Last edited by SweetnLow91SC; 03-02-2007 at 12:29 AM.
SweetnLow91SC is offline  


Quick Reply: The K2P is finally here! Pics..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.