General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

New Iasca Rules Coming!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2005, 11:57 AM
  #1  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
sawnicxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
Arrow

Just wanted to get some feedback as to what you guys think about some of the new rule changes for 2006.

SPL and RTA are back. You will have a score for SPL and RTA and have to go through the judges lane without making adjustments to the EQ. Some people feel that SPL and RTA have nothing to do in an SQ event, but it will definately make you set up your car differently. I could be wrong, but from what I understand, the power classes will all be unified in every category.

I was told that there is no more power classes, just the category you compete in! To get more info, go to the site, but it looks as though it could be a wild year for IASCA.

What are your thoughts? Should SQ have these items in them?
sawnicxs is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 12:11 PM
  #2  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
SweetnLow91SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 884
Post

yeah....... I have emailed IASCA for them to reconsider the rule changes already. I just don't like to see the same issues which happened at the finals in the mid 90s reoccuring again.
SweetnLow91SC is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 03:26 PM
  #3  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
sawnicxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
Post

The whole thing seems to be up in the air with competitors. Some hate the idea, and some like the idea because it makes you have a good sounding car that has to be smooth in freq response as well as play loud. Maybe those things shouldn't be there, but the fact that they throw a curve at you and make you really think about your sound setup is kind of interesting.

Anyhow, I hope there is no big thing either....that was messy.
sawnicxs is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 03:27 PM
  #4  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (5)
 
zzzzzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,643
Post

Originally posted by SweetnLow91SC:
yeah....... I have emailed IASCA for them to reconsider the rule changes already. I just don't like to see the same issues which happened at the finals in the mid 90s reoccuring again.
what happened in the 90s ?
zzzzzzz is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 03:36 PM
  #5  
 
chev2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 1,220
Post

Originally posted by zzzzzzz:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by SweetnLow91SC:
yeah....... I have emailed IASCA for them to reconsider the rule changes already. I just don't like to see the same issues which happened at the finals in the mid 90s reoccuring again.
what happened in the 90s ? </font>[/QUOTE]People went to shows? and there was more then a hand-full of competitors there.

haha [img]smile.gif[/img]
chev2 is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 04:57 PM
  #8  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
fozzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,339
Post

RTA has no real bearing on SQ. This seems to be the biggest issue. SPL seemsto have people on both sides of the fence. An RTA cannot tell you how your car sounds. A smooth curve dosent mean your car sounds "smooth". And unless your mic is calibrated the same as the mic that is being used for testing,you probably wont get the same results anyway. I went to lots of shows this past year. RTA was never used due to noise issues. But I figured that it would be used for sure at Finals this year. So I was the sucker who dragged all my stuff (had to check out of the hotel)into the hall at 7am to prepare for my RTA testing. I made sure my score would have been perfect (or close to) and it didnt even get judged because the hall was too noisy! I still won, but I could have use the sleep.
fozzz is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:52 PM
  #9  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
SweetnLow91SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 884
Post

Originally posted by zzzzzzz:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by SweetnLow91SC:
yeah....... I have emailed IASCA for them to reconsider the rule changes already. I just don't like to see the same issues which happened at the finals in the mid 90s reoccuring again.
what happened in the 90s ? </font>[/QUOTE]Well....... I have already mentioned what happened in the mid 90s in the other thread, but I'll mention it again here. People at the finals were installing "black boxes" develop by manufacturers like Phoenix Gold to get an edge over others that didn't! Basically what it does is when the volume is crank up to a preset level..... a bass boost kicks in. So you could have a flat RTA and do 140+db safely.

Why the concern?...... running a flat curve at 135+db could hurt the sensitive mid/high frequency drivers. which will effect the SQ.

[ December 20, 2005, 08:26 PM: Message edited by: SweetnLow91SC ]
SweetnLow91SC is offline  
Old 12-20-2005, 07:31 PM
  #10  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
sawnicxs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
Post

I got one of those boxes. Actually Scott buwala e-mailed and said he still had his too. It later became the basscube but without the input voltage adjustment to turn it on.
sawnicxs is offline  


Quick Reply: New Iasca Rules Coming!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.