General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

SQ AMP -- A/B vs D

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 05:25 PM
  #41  
Halo1's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 146
Post

If you are using the amp only for LOW freq's reproduction or for a sub...then I recomend a class D amplifier...the small difference in SQ Between A/B and D amps is comparing apples to oranges.

When using a Class D amp for Mids/Hi's at higher power levels there is audible distortion due to insuffient MOSFET transients in the Higher Freq's.

Although when using Class D for powering a Sub-Woofer there i s no audible distortion when d riven i nto clipping...although it will produce more power more efficiently when driving Freq's below 90HZ.
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 05:31 PM
  #42  
1LoudScort00's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 632
Post

theres the crossfire vr2000d



High current Class "D" subwoofer amplifier,1000w x 1RMS into 4 ohms Continuously variable 12dB x-over between 50 and 250Hz, Continuously variable subsonic filter between 20 and 50Hz with on/off circuit, RCA preamp output, CFR-3 analog subwoofer level control, 2000W x1 into 2 ohm. 9.3"W x 2.1"H x 22"L
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #43  
Justin LaRouche's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 678
Post

Originally posted by mike bisson:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Justin LaRouche:
^^^^i will take that with a grain of salt as u are a rf fan!
Have you noticed that even Alpine uses non-regulated power supplies in some of their amps? </font>[/QUOTE]hey Mike! lol i should have figured that would wake u up.lol i have no ties to alpine just so u know. not even a fan of there gear any more for that matter. i think the general line made changes that i don't agree with any who. love the f1 stuff but hay only guys like Oakly have that privlage. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 08:06 AM
  #44  
Sassmaster's Avatar
Merry Christmass from CCA
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,579
Post

regulated power supplies (such as JL's) leave almost no room for musical peaks and transients, I guess if you're just into playing bass discs as loud as you can, regulated is the way to go, but I've never seen anyone but JL market a tightly regulated power supply as better than unregulated.

"JL audio, the best choice of the uneducated"
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 09:32 AM
  #45  
1LoudScort00's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 632
Post

Orion 1200D



http://www.cardomain.com/item/ORI47405?ref=deal
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #46  
Halo1's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 146
Post

That amp looks like it came of the set of Star-Trek. [img]graemlins/cf2.gif[/img]
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #47  
1LoudScort00's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 632
Post

Originally posted by Halo1:
That amp looks like it came of the set of Star-Trek. [img]graemlins/cf2.gif[/img]
lol, it does, I take it you havnt seen any of orions line up of amps?? most of theres all look like that, some are smaller then otheres
Old Feb 1, 2006 | 10:31 PM
  #48  
Justin LaRouche's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 678
Post

Originally posted by Sassmaster:
regulated power supplies (such as JL's) leave almost no room for musical peaks and transients, I guess if you're just into playing bass discs as loud as you can, regulated is the way to go, but I've never seen anyone but JL market a tightly regulated power supply as better than unregulated.

"JL audio, the best choice of the uneducated"
u say uneducated! lol. well then i guess that makes u oppionated. [img]tongue.gif[/img] i am not saying that unregulated is no good just not my first choice. that just being my oppion. i've listened to a lot of bolth and i like the sound of one better. [img]smile.gif[/img]

[ February 01, 2006, 11:33 PM: Message edited by: Justin LaRouche ]




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 PM.