Install related Need a car audio install related question answered? Have a tip you want to share, post in here!

Enclosure size, bigger maybe not better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2008, 01:55 AM
  #1  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
John__Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 483
Enclosure size, bigger maybe not better?

I just picked up a pair of these:

122.7 Subs, not installed yet.

I have this box:

The box is 2.8 cubic feet (1.4 per chamber), tuned for 38Hz, and I currently have the ports sealed with expanding foam insulation because of the current subs. Sealed sounded better with them, but of course, they are coming out.

Infinity recommends a 1.0 cubic foot sealed box so I'm 40% over, and 2.0 cubic feet for vented, so 30% under there

Infinity sub spec sheet:http://manuals.harman.com/INF/CAR/Bo...ers/122.7w.pdf

Yes, I know...Buy or build a new box but I want to use what I have.

The subs will be getting 300 or 350rms each (haven't decided yet).

My thinking is to reduce the enclosure size internally closer to 1.0 and leave the ports sealed up tight. From reading here, I think a "too small" vented box is a very bad idea, both for the subs and for SQ.

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

John
John__Taylor is offline  
Old 08-29-2008, 12:25 PM
  #2  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (2)
 
The Wizard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 285
What is the dimensions and length of the ports currently in the box?
The Wizard is offline  
Old 08-29-2008, 01:50 PM
  #3  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
John__Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 483
Originally Posted by The Wizard
What is the dimensions and length of the ports currently in the box?
About 12" length X 1.25" wide X 14" Deep.

They are 80% filled at the moment, but the expanding foam stuff chips out fairly easily, plus I used a plastic liner to ease removal. It seals very, very well. You can have a song wailing away and put a Bic over the port, flame doesnt even waver.

Thanks

John
John__Taylor is offline  
Old 08-29-2008, 03:27 PM
  #4  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
veeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
seal it and get .4 cuft of styrofoam blocks to put in each chamber...that will yield an internal volume of 1.0 cube per driver. You can just glue them down to the inside of the box.
veeman is offline  
Old 08-31-2008, 12:41 AM
  #5  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
John__Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 483
Originally Posted by veeman
seal it and get .4 cuft of styrofoam blocks to put in each chamber...that will yield an internal volume of 1.0 cube per driver. You can just glue them down to the inside of the box.
Never thought of that.

I used sections of 4"x4" to fill it up.

The enclosure probably weighs 250lbs by now, with the deadening, fiberfill, wood, and subs, heh heh.
John__Taylor is offline  
Old 08-31-2008, 03:04 PM
  #6  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
John__Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 483
Originally Posted by John__Taylor
The enclosure probably weighs 250lbs by now, with the deadening, fiberfill, wood, and subs, heh heh.
I am taking the subs out and using styrofoam in place of the 4"x4". The enclosure is simply too heavy for me to even take it out of the truck now and thats not good.

Before anyone says anything, yes, I have 2 stainless anchors lag bolted to the back of the box, connected to the frame tie down hooks with 2000lb rated straps. It could be better of course, but I'm pretty confident in that set up.

John
John__Taylor is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wasted911
General Discussion
7
05-04-2017 08:40 PM
ba3000man
Enclosure Design & Construction Help
4
01-21-2009 07:14 AM
shaunewd
General Discussion
2
10-13-2005 06:54 PM



Quick Reply: Enclosure size, bigger maybe not better?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 AM.