Resistance
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yes, but it won't help.
IE: Your sub will always get the same power, but the resistor will be eating power too.
Think of it this way. At 8 ohms, your amp puts out (say) 100W
Well, you use a resistor and lower the resistance to 4 ohms ... the amp NOW puts out 200W. Well, 100W of that power goes to the sub and 100w goes to the resistor. So, now you're wasting power heating a resistor for no reason.
IE: Your sub will always get the same power, but the resistor will be eating power too.
Think of it this way. At 8 ohms, your amp puts out (say) 100W
Well, you use a resistor and lower the resistance to 4 ohms ... the amp NOW puts out 200W. Well, 100W of that power goes to the sub and 100w goes to the resistor. So, now you're wasting power heating a resistor for no reason.
Originally posted by Dukk:
^ AND your sub will actually be getting LESS power.
Who knows why?
^ AND your sub will actually be getting LESS power.
Who knows why?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Chadxton:
I'm assuming that's the function of an Accumatch, so really it proves no point having one? Am I right or wrong?
I'm assuming that's the function of an Accumatch, so really it proves no point having one? Am I right or wrong?
Cool. I like learning stuff. So it's a constant electrical impedance load that the Accumatch adjusts to, right? Therefore it does benefit giving it extra power I assume.
[ July 20, 2003, 10:41 AM: Message edited by: Chadxton ]
[ July 20, 2003, 10:41 AM: Message edited by: Chadxton ]
actually Tom, wouldn't it be the other way around? since the sub's impedence tends to also be a functions of its frequency response ( i hope i have the terminology right) it may drop below 8 ohms at certain frequencies, which would normally draw more power, but with the the constant impedence of the resistor, we have a constant amount of power..
correct?
correct?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



