General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

2 12w3 vs 1 12w7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2009, 02:24 PM
  #11  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Weman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 461
I'm not going for loudness going for sq
But u are correct sealed and ported would make a difference and my box is sealed to the lol
Weman is offline  
Old 07-17-2009, 02:28 PM
  #12  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
DeadlySones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,751
Originally Posted by Weman
I'm not going for loudness going for sq
But u are correct sealed and ported would make a difference and my box is sealed to the lol
Hey, don't get me wrong .... I loved the sound of my 3 12W6v2's sealed. I just like how much louder they are ported. They play lower without worrying about over excursion and the SQ did not really shift that much. Still tight, accurate and snappy as hell.
DeadlySones is offline  
Old 07-17-2009, 03:36 PM
  #13  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Weman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 461
That's why I love jl snappy tight deep sound, anyways back on topic if your from around niagara I'd let u listen to my w7 if u wanted. Ud just have to meet me , its way different then in a shop.

Last edited by Weman; 07-17-2009 at 03:39 PM.
Weman is offline  
Old 07-17-2009, 07:32 PM
  #14  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
n_o_s_21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 912
Originally Posted by Mr. Marco
a single 12W7 has twice the excursion and more surface area than a single 12W3 correct?
at full power handling i would think the W7 would be louder but Weman seems to have a different and actual experience.
the comparison is between 2 w3's and 1 w7.....not 1 and 1. just because the w7 has more excursion, it doesn't make up for double the cone area.

if it were just 1 sub vs 1 sub, it would be a different outcome....
n_o_s_21 is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 01:17 AM
  #15  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
cspurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 286
I guess my curiosity lies with the xmax. everyone knows that 2 subs move more air than one sub...all things being equal of course. My though was because the w7 had twice the xmax of the w3 that it would move the same amount of air.
cspurdy is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 07:09 AM
  #16  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (4)
 
DeadlySones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,751
Originally Posted by cspurdy
I guess my curiosity lies with the xmax. everyone knows that 2 subs move more air than one sub...all things being equal of course. My though was because the w7 had twice the xmax of the w3 that it would move the same amount of air.
I thought that too. I think I might of even made a post about it before or asked on someones thread. After some serious debate, cone area rules. lol, Go big or go home .... seems to be the same with amps....
DeadlySones is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 10:42 AM
  #17  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
BigRedGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,383
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by cspurdy
I guess my curiosity lies with the xmax. everyone knows that 2 subs move more air than one sub...all things being equal of course. My though was because the w7 had twice the xmax of the w3 that it would move the same amount of air.
The volume of air in the extra 13mm of excursion from the same size driver seems like it should equal the volume of air being moved by the second driver........however in a practical, real world scenario with correct enclosures and same amp power total the higher over-all output goes to the pair of drivers every time......

This example is a good one because of the high degree of similarity between the W3s and W7s........you could find a single driver that would do better than 2 crummy ones, but that is not an apples to apples comparison.

The old saying is "There's no replacement for displacement".......
BigRedGuy is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 11:24 AM
  #18  
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Lyle's GTP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 103
Originally Posted by BigRedGuy
The old saying is "There's no replacement for displacement".......
That's more an automotive quote, but still fits.

Think of it this way, if you have an 6 cylinder engine with 3 liters of displacement, and a 3 cylinder engine with 3 liters of displacement, would you expect the same amount of power?

They are different animals, when you factor in amplifier power and enclosure design, this really messes with the numbers.

It's possible, that with enough power and the right box, you could get one W7 to do the same as two W3's. But you would probably cook it in a very short time.

Lyle
Lyle's GTP is offline  
Old 07-18-2009, 01:48 PM
  #19  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (10)
 
Sasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,418
Do not forget about the coupling effect of placing two subs close to each other, which may give you a gain of around 3db, and that is nothing to sneeze at. A single W7 has no chance.
Sasha is offline  
Old 07-23-2009, 11:17 PM
  #20  
50 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
cspurdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 286
Originally Posted by Sasha
Do not forget about the coupling effect of placing two subs close to each other, which may give you a gain of around 3db, and that is nothing to sneeze at. A single W7 has no chance.
Does the coupling effect still apply if my box is two seperate chambers or is the coupling effect created outside the box.
cspurdy is offline  


Quick Reply: 2 12w3 vs 1 12w7



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.