General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

Type X or Type R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-22-2010, 12:45 PM
  #11  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
veeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
Originally Posted by BLU3Fi5H
Isnt the X twice the rms rating of the R? I dont have info to back it up, but im pretty sure the x has a higher xmax too. I have heard a direct comparison between the x and the r, but the systems were both very different so it is a bit hard to judge by the setups, but the x definitely sounded better.
Admittedly, he WAS running better equipment in general (better components, amps, even wiring).
it does, 529 cm^2 sd x 19 mm x max for the X vs. 480 cm^2 x 18.2 mm xmax for the R , so about 132 cc of extra displacement and 1000 rms vs 500 rms though both have been known to handle significantly more for long periods. I don't think there is any doubt which driver is superior overall, but to say the R is not a good sub is not true. I think a lot of folks get caught up in brand bashing and particularly if they see them as selling out to big box stores etc...They become easy targets for enthusiasts to dump on even if they are still making good products. I guess part of the bragging rights of owning an exclusive brand is that you can't find it in every car on the street. You know Fi might make a great sub, but I bet there are very few people that claim they're great that have actually ever heard one...I've yet to hear one.

Last edited by veeman; 07-22-2010 at 01:44 PM.
veeman is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 12:48 PM
  #12  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (-1)
 
BLU3Fi5H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by veeman
it does, 529 cm^2 sd x 19 mm x max for the X vs. 480 cm^2 x 18.2 mm xmax for the R , so about 132 cc of extra displacement and 1000 rms vs 500 rms though both have been known to handle significantly more for long periods. I don't think there is any doubt which driver is superior overall, but to say the R is not a good sub is not true.
I couldnt agree more. Type R's are still decent subs and sound decent too.
Personally if i could get my hands on a pair of them for real cheap i would probably already have them slammin in the car right now. hehe
BLU3Fi5H is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 08:48 PM
  #13  
0 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
 
thekingdonecome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 28
so really if space permits, the better deal would be two type r's instead of a single type x? same power consumption and stuff, and im sure two type r's (500wrms version) would be cheaper than one type x, correct? i have the type x and its fabuous, i want to get more out of the SQ subs and into SPL, and im seeing if a trade between two 12 type r's would benefit me any from a single type x (currently running)
thekingdonecome is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 09:26 PM
  #14  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (-1)
 
BLU3Fi5H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by thekingdonecome
i want to get more out of the SQ subs and into SPL
Yeah if that's the case i would go with the type R's.
BLU3Fi5H is offline  
Old 07-22-2010, 09:56 PM
  #15  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
veeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,455
there's no comparison in terms of output between 2 type r's and a single x...just by the numbers it's easy to see...type x moves 1005 cc's of air at xmax, 2 type r's 1747 cc's. Assuming both in correct boxes for what you want...the X would lose that battle.
veeman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ryan231
General Discussion
24
12-27-2007 06:41 AM
Chizzy
General SQ
24
12-26-2007 09:54 PM
dvandy
General SQ
4
11-26-2006 03:57 PM
merc
Enclosure Design & Construction Help
4
08-27-2006 07:12 PM



Quick Reply: Type X or Type R



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.