General Discussion General discussion about all things car audio, from pioneer, orion, alpine and eclipse.

unbeleivable

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2004, 10:42 AM
  #31  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
slow/n\low's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Post

Originally posted by db:
home audio differs from car audio in the way of
power ratings car audio can be advertised in max power ratings the only governing factory is the manufaature has to print the rms ratings in the owners manual, however they have been known to print them @ 14.4v and leave out the 12v ratings.

home audio however is governed by csa regulations
and are required to have the only rms ratings of the product either on the unit/box/manual.

the fuse on the unit is for protection of a short in the unit itself.

110v and 12v are two different aspects however wiring the spkrs with better quality wire i found makes a difference especially if your spkrs are across the room and you have 30' of length!!

if you see some of the new gear coming out in the next little while head units primarily alpine
instead of having 50wx4 on the box it says 17wx4
regulations are coming

no more wool over the eyes for the average consumer!!!!
Since when are rating governed by the CSA.. you mean CEA ...
slow/n\low is offline  
Old 08-13-2004, 10:53 AM
  #32  
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
slow/n\low's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 866
Post

Originally posted by mike bisson:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by JordyO:
Same thing happened with my dad at FS. They sold him like an $80 Monster optical audio cables and the sales guy assured him that this was all he needed to hook up the DVD player to the surround sound. (hi, pictures would be nice?)\

I had him return it and picked up an RCA brand one from RadioShack for $20.

I know some of you audiophiles might think that the Monster brand cable would be a lot better but my dad's already got hearing aides. I doubt he'd notice a difference between ANY audio cable
--- LOL the same thing happened to me!!! I was hooking up a friend's new Shaw box and needed an optical cable -- the FS associate told me to get the $80 monster cable -- I can't blame him for trying; however, I can blame him for arguing with me that there is a difference in optical cables (not -- it is light pulses after all) and for looking at me like I was on crack for asking for a TOS link (first saying that they don't exist and then saying I was using the wrong term)! ...So, I went to Visions and the associate there sold me one for $15 and understood what a TOS link is.


* The above is not meant to depict that all FS associates are incompetent. Many shops have incompetent sales people.
</font>[/QUOTE]There is definatly a differance Mike.. A cheap Optical cable with have a poor connection point at both ends. while a superior cable with have a better build quality minimizing loss at the connection point... 99% of any loss in an optical cable in the home audio environment will be in the poor connection.. which is why digital coax is always a better choice.. But optical sound cool and it impresses customers...(wooooo optical).

So ya there is a differance. [img]tongue.gif[/img]
slow/n\low is offline  
Old 08-14-2004, 12:05 AM
  #33  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
mike bisson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,156
Post

^^^^ oh my son, it sounds like you drink the Kool Aid.... I have not experiance any difference in blind A/B tests between a "cheap" optical cable and an expensive one. The issue of "connection point" is not an issue -- it either lets the light pulses go through or it does not.

Yes, a "good" Coax digital cable will sound better that an optical cable IF:

A) it has true 75 ohm connectors
B) it is well shielded

The one primary advantage of opitcal is that it is "idiot proof" and that there are not any bad optical cables.


PS...oh and by the way... any good video cable is a good "digital" cable, since they both have to be 75 ohm.


DON'T DRINK THE KOOL AID!!!
mike bisson is offline  
Old 08-14-2004, 07:35 AM
  #35  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
pinhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,770
Post

Originally posted by mike bisson:
the more important factor is if the receiver's power supply is discrete or not.
i think you mean output is discrete
since all home amp power supplys i've seen consist of a transformer and capacitors and rectifiers
pinhead is offline  
Old 08-14-2004, 08:55 AM
  #36  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (3)
 
Haunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,218
Post

Looked around, most stuff I see is rated to Federal Trade Commision standard... Continuous RMS power all channels driven into some load/bandwidth/%THD (they have to say what)

Also found some IEA ratings...

CSA & CEA ratings seem to be for powersupplies (DC & AC, respectivly) [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]

I'll be back at my buddies sometime soon, I'll take a closer look at his kenwood reciever I mentioned... but based on it's size and output of the speakers he was running.... didn't seem like it was 100RMSx5 at all.....

Guess I could be wrong thou...
Haunz is offline  
Old 08-14-2004, 10:20 AM
  #37  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
JRace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,242
Post

Originally posted by mike bisson:
^^^^ oh my son, it sounds like you drink the Kool Aid.... I have not experiance any difference in blind A/B tests between a "cheap" optical cable and an expensive one. The issue of "connection point" is not an issue -- it either lets the light pulses go through or it does not.

Yes, a "good" Coax digital cable will sound better that an optical cable IF:

A) it has true 75 ohm connectors
B) it is well shielded

The one primary advantage of opitcal is that it is "idiot proof" and that there are not any bad optical cables.


PS...oh and by the way... any good video cable is a good "digital" cable, since they both have to be 75 ohm.


DON'T DRINK THE KOOL AID!!!
The only reason a co-ax cable is better than an optical cable is because an optical cable can become damaged (ie: the glass inside the cable gets broken is the cable is pinched).
JRace is offline  
Old 08-14-2004, 11:33 AM
  #40  
2000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Orion_95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,260
Post

What about the fact that when using an optical cable, You have 2 extra conversions (electrical-light and back) And we all know conversions = loss.

??? thoughts ???
Orion_95 is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.