Time Alignment
[img]smile.gif[/img]
03-10-2004, 10:56 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Fat Whacker:
It would be interesting to hear those top cars without the TA. Just to see how much time was actually spent on staging and imaging before the TA was brought into the system.
I dunno...I am still up in the air about this whole TA stuff. I guess its technology making things easier for people. I am kinda old fasioned I guess. [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
It would be interesting to hear those top cars without the TA. Just to see how much time was actually spent on staging and imaging before the TA was brought into the system.
I dunno...I am still up in the air about this whole TA stuff. I guess its technology making things easier for people. I am kinda old fasioned I guess. [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
It's like people who say NOS is fake HP, that's no consolation when you're at the finish line behind the other guy.
Same thing with TA, at a comp it's easy to say, people who use it are lazy (which I would argue) but that's no consolation when they're onstage and you're not.
Like I said use the tools available, and you will get better results.
03-10-2004, 12:27 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by DWVW:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fat Whacker:
It would be interesting to hear those top cars without the TA. Just to see how much time was actually spent on staging and imaging before the TA was brought into the system.
I dunno...I am still up in the air about this whole TA stuff. I guess its technology making things easier for people. I am kinda old fasioned I guess. [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Fat Whacker:
It would be interesting to hear those top cars without the TA. Just to see how much time was actually spent on staging and imaging before the TA was brought into the system.
I dunno...I am still up in the air about this whole TA stuff. I guess its technology making things easier for people. I am kinda old fasioned I guess. [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
It's like people who say NOS is fake HP, that's no consolation when you're at the finish line behind the other guy.
Same thing with TA, at a comp it's easy to say, people who use it are lazy (which I would argue) but that's no consolation when they're onstage and you're not.
Like I said use the tools available, and you will get better results. </font>[/QUOTE]I understand those cars will still be good without the TA because they take the time to set up things right and then use it to fine tune. I would still be intersted to see exactly how much a difference made in the top finishing cars and if there would be any changes in how they ranked if it was not used.
I am not against the use of TA by any means. I understand its just another tool to help your system. Like I said, I guess I am old school.
03-10-2004, 03:14 PM
#27
Yankee
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
I am not against the use of TA by any means. I understand its just another tool to help your system. Like I said, I guess I am old school.
03-10-2004, 08:22 PM
#30
If you're thinking about changing decks I found a Pioneer P1R for sale.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3083976385
-time alignment
-13 band eq
-triple 4v outputs
-great crossovers
-nice sound quality
-etc.
Just a thought. Not mp3 compatible though if that's an issue.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3083976385
-time alignment
-13 band eq
-triple 4v outputs
-great crossovers
-nice sound quality
-etc.
Just a thought. Not mp3 compatible though if that's an issue.
