j-body.com
go there and see if you can get a cheap front bumper from someone or if there is an even cheaper aftermarket bumper you can get.. they are all good guys there and would probably help you out greatly [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]

[ January 19, 2005, 05:36 PM: Message edited by: Original_Bigguns ]

 

When this jackass pulled out in front of us, which it was clearly his fault we would have had to still pay the deductible but since it was write off we did't have to...

 

Yeah I have been checking out J-body.org it's the free site lol, seeing what people have while at work on midnights....Insurance basically said I am screw with the fault regardless of the road conditions mean while I am thinking the only reason I hit her was becuase she stopped for a yellow light and the roads where just ice which is why I slid into her " Doesn't matter you still rear ended her" umm ok **** u 2... that was about it.....

 

Other then the huge crack in the middle but when I tape it up for the time being it will look better....




Then at least the car will look some what whole, and then it will give me time to shop for a front bumper.

 

(I am thinking the only reason I hit her was becuase she stopped for a yellow light and the roads where just ice which is why I slid into her " )....I hate to say it but the law says you have to stop at a yellow if possible...Plus she was able to stop no problem doesn't sound like it was her fault...( you did say you seen the light turn yellow so you should have been ready to stop)just my 2 cents

 

Thanks I am aware of the law, and unless u can't f'in read I already stated I was at fault if the light is turning yellow it means proceed with caution or stop if you can.! In ****y weather u don't ****ing stop your damn car... it was green when we approached then turned yellow she could have clearly kept going as would have been the case if I was the lead car I wouldn't stop.... But I am glad you point out something I already didn't ****in know.. good thing ur on CCA or I wouldn't have learned something new.

[ January 19, 2005, 08:50 PM: Message edited by: ChizzerZ24 ]

 

This is true, but the not-at-fault insuring company will go after the at-fault insuring company after the claims are all settled to get their money back.

As Haunz said, no fault is a misnomer - it has more to do with procedure and paperwork. If anything, it gives the insurance companies the ability to assess fault to BOTH parties instead of having to definitively choose one or the other.

Mark

 

You OBVIOUSLY arn't...

what is he going to do... sue his insurance company over his rate hike after a claim was made against him for something that was clearly his fault... yea... that would be worth the lawyer... [img]graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] </font>[/QUOTE][img]graemlins/boring.gif[/img] you obviously can't read dude so I'm not even gonna bother anymore. I never said anything about a lawyer nor did I say it WASNT his fault. Seriously learn to read between the lines before you reply to a post of mine.


On another note, the drive home from work tonight saw a caravan in the ditch, we got like 10 cm and/or more dropped on us today it snowed fromthe time I woke up (before then of course) till 5pm and then some here and there non stop.

[ January 19, 2005, 09:32 PM: Message edited by: Blind ]

 

The chick herself slid as well when trying to stop so it's not like she just stopped on a dime.. anyway bah not getting into that....