Mp3's an advantage to high end audio?
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,078
True,
Obviously, the 'bigwigs' exploit the artists just as much, probably even more, than downloaders exploit the industry...
The sad part is that for the most part the artists didnt realize this, up until a few years ago when artists really began to create their own record labels, etc...
Its a parasitic industry in general.
Obviously, the 'bigwigs' exploit the artists just as much, probably even more, than downloaders exploit the industry...
The sad part is that for the most part the artists didnt realize this, up until a few years ago when artists really began to create their own record labels, etc...
Its a parasitic industry in general.
2000 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,142
I don't know what the beef with MP3's are. I think they sound great! As long as they are encoded in 192 or higher. The human ear can barely detect quality differences in 192kbps and cd quality. UNLESS, you have like an SQ application in your car or house with like 12 speakers doing all the highs and lows. I listen to my mp3's on my home system and then my normal CD's and I think they both sound excellent. So all the moaning about MP3's not sounding good really sounds odd to me. I dunno, maybe it is just me but I think they sound fantastic!!!
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,494
the reason why the recordings are gettin ****tier is becouse everyone is downloading and not buying the records, so there for the artist cant afford to pay for a better quality of recording.. this would be my guess
-db
-db
500 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 756
I still buy CDs... [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
The only reason I have MP3s is to use in my portable player when I go to the gym.. Very few MP3s sound as good as CD audio IMO, I can almost always tell the difference unless the sampling rate is >192KHz
The only reason I have MP3s is to use in my portable player when I go to the gym.. Very few MP3s sound as good as CD audio IMO, I can almost always tell the difference unless the sampling rate is >192KHz
500 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 747
I buy cds too but I dl a song or two first to get a taste of the cd and if I like it I'll buy it but if I don't then I just delete it oh yeah and when I get a cd I rip it onto my computer and use my computer to play the songs
Guest
Posts: n/a
I jave yet to hear an MP3 that sounded as good as a CD. Now when I offer this challenge to all the computer geeks I get to pick the system. And lets say that sure there may be no difference on some systems, but on the setup I use there is.
Recording quality has nothing to do with artists not being able to afford good recording because of MP3, it has to do with marketing, when people buy ****ty little 3" cube speakers on their computers and for home theaters, recording engineers will make the music sound good on it. Unfortunately people actually think those crappy little speakers sound good, so it's all their fault. Next time you meet someone with crappy little 3" speakers (even ones costing $1,000
) punch them in the face and say, that's from DWVW for ruining music.
Recording quality has nothing to do with artists not being able to afford good recording because of MP3, it has to do with marketing, when people buy ****ty little 3" cube speakers on their computers and for home theaters, recording engineers will make the music sound good on it. Unfortunately people actually think those crappy little speakers sound good, so it's all their fault. Next time you meet someone with crappy little 3" speakers (even ones costing $1,000
) punch them in the face and say, that's from DWVW for ruining music.
