OLD SKOOL Kicker XPL Subs ?
#2
If the model # is X10C-4 it was last produced in 1999 I believe. Cast aluminum frame, XMAX of 10.35mm, 350 watts power handling. http://thebassbin.co.uk/shop/product...ts_id/127.html Hope that helps a bit.
[ March 04, 2005, 01:40 AM: Message edited by: Jeepbeats ]
[ March 04, 2005, 01:40 AM: Message edited by: Jeepbeats ]
#5
FS = 24 hertz
Qms = 10.21
Vas = 3.542 cu.ft
Mms = 2.554 oz
Xmax = 0.407 in
Sd = 52.7 sq.in
Qes = 0.529
Re = 3.1 ohms
Le = 0.427 mH
Z = 4 ohms
BL = 1.796 lb/A
Pe = 350 watts
Qts = 0.503
1-W SPL = 86.7 dB
[img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
[ March 04, 2005, 09:45 PM: Message edited by: SPL donut ... ]
Qms = 10.21
Vas = 3.542 cu.ft
Mms = 2.554 oz
Xmax = 0.407 in
Sd = 52.7 sq.in
Qes = 0.529
Re = 3.1 ohms
Le = 0.427 mH
Z = 4 ohms
BL = 1.796 lb/A
Pe = 350 watts
Qts = 0.503
1-W SPL = 86.7 dB
[img]graemlins/thumb.gif[/img]
[ March 04, 2005, 09:45 PM: Message edited by: SPL donut ... ]
#7
If it is the 1997 version, X10-4, here are the specs:
FS = 26.17hertz
Qms = 7.729
Vas = 4.838 cu.ft
Mms = 1.564 oz
Xmax = 0.293 in
Sd = 52.7 sq.in
Qes = 0.458
Re = 3.11 ohms
Le = 0.241 mH
Z = 4 ohms
BL = 1.581 lb/A
Pe = 300 watts
Qts = 0.432
1-W SPL = 89.58 dB
Little bit different from the ones above^^^^
FS = 26.17hertz
Qms = 7.729
Vas = 4.838 cu.ft
Mms = 1.564 oz
Xmax = 0.293 in
Sd = 52.7 sq.in
Qes = 0.458
Re = 3.11 ohms
Le = 0.241 mH
Z = 4 ohms
BL = 1.581 lb/A
Pe = 300 watts
Qts = 0.432
1-W SPL = 89.58 dB
Little bit different from the ones above^^^^
#9
Rob what you have are a pair of Kicker XPL-KX10.4
As Loud stated they are from the '96-97 era and are quite different than the newer style XPL's (X10c) which had a slightly higher power handling rating (350rms), lower sensitivity (88.5dB), and different cone material.
Yours are rated at 300rms and have a sensitivity number just shy of 90dB.
Personally I never got a chance to audition the first gen. XPL's but I did try out the second gen's and I thought they were a great driver.
Handled a good amount of power, worked in many smaller enclosures and sounded excellent.
A bit expensive for what you were getting I thought but a good performer still.
As Loud stated they are from the '96-97 era and are quite different than the newer style XPL's (X10c) which had a slightly higher power handling rating (350rms), lower sensitivity (88.5dB), and different cone material.
Yours are rated at 300rms and have a sensitivity number just shy of 90dB.
Personally I never got a chance to audition the first gen. XPL's but I did try out the second gen's and I thought they were a great driver.
Handled a good amount of power, worked in many smaller enclosures and sounded excellent.
A bit expensive for what you were getting I thought but a good performer still.