Preliminary Draft - Major Rules Changes 2004
Guest
Posts: n/a
I am so-so on the suggestion of power ratings..
The standard that was reffered to is the CEA-2006. This is a standard format (set of rules) for testing power. It is extremely similar to the method I use. Continuous power at a specific frequency, with a specific amount of distortion with a specific supply voltage. It only makes sense to eliminate all the variables.
Eliminating two-seaters doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but I just haven't figured out the logic yet. Once I do, it should make sense.
The standard that was reffered to is the CEA-2006. This is a standard format (set of rules) for testing power. It is extremely similar to the method I use. Continuous power at a specific frequency, with a specific amount of distortion with a specific supply voltage. It only makes sense to eliminate all the variables.
Eliminating two-seaters doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but I just haven't figured out the logic yet. Once I do, it should make sense.
Hi Dave! the biggest problem with the crx is that most competitors at works had their amps laying on the floor just behind the seat. i feel it would be fair if they had a predetermined area in which all equipment must be installed.last years rules were full of grey areas,perhaps things will be more precise in intended meaning.L8r 
500 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 924
hmmmm so the whole space for 4 passengers in street.... i take it to mean no folding the rear seats down to slide my box back..... = 3-4db loss for me... 
it sucks, but at the same time if it keeps a 150+db crx outta my class.....ill have to adjust.... thats if the new concept im workin on is even condusive to any kinda decent SPL numbers.... [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
it sucks, but at the same time if it keeps a 150+db crx outta my class.....ill have to adjust.... thats if the new concept im workin on is even condusive to any kinda decent SPL numbers.... [img]graemlins/dunno.gif[/img]
Originally posted by Tha-Game:
hmmmm so the whole space for 4 passengers in street.... i take it to mean no folding the rear seats down to slide my box back.....
hmmmm so the whole space for 4 passengers in street.... i take it to mean no folding the rear seats down to slide my box back.....
take it to mean no folding the rear seats down to slide my box back.....
and yes u can fold the seats. but the 'normal use' restriction must be applicable....apperantly u didnt follow that to begin with.
500 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 924
see now really what would the difference have been between me doing that, vs someone with a crx whos box is up against their front seats?
but like i said, i did that at a number of shows since i got the kia, and no one ever said i couldnt, if they had i wouldnt have, oh well done is done.
guess the new rules will be more clear and will prevent mixups like that, i understood the rules incorrectly i guess
but like i said, i did that at a number of shows since i got the kia, and no one ever said i couldnt, if they had i wouldnt have, oh well done is done.
guess the new rules will be more clear and will prevent mixups like that, i understood the rules incorrectly i guess
50 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 306
Originally posted by Tha-Game:
see now really what would the difference have been between me doing that, vs someone with a crx whos box is up against their front seats?
see now really what would the difference have been between me doing that, vs someone with a crx whos box is up against their front seats?
If that were the case, then I'd gladly take a minivan in Street and remove all the seats and point my subs directly forwards, no wall stylez, YO!
Street wasn't always ruled by CRX's.
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,484
Originally posted by Chris B:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by o0DiaLiNG0o:
I think the reason for limiting physical size of the battery was because people were using huge train/tractor batteries and whatnot last year???
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by o0DiaLiNG0o:
I think the reason for limiting physical size of the battery was because people were using huge train/tractor batteries and whatnot last year???
500 Watt CAFz'r
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 679
Originally posted by Team Obsession:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Chris B:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by o0DiaLiNG0o:
I think the reason for limiting physical size of the battery was because people were using huge train/tractor batteries and whatnot last year???
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Chris B:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by o0DiaLiNG0o:
I think the reason for limiting physical size of the battery was because people were using huge train/tractor batteries and whatnot last year???
</font>[/QUOTE]I'm in it for the enjoyment and fun. But the fact is having no chance to win isn't fun cause everythings more enjoyable when you win, or are atleast able to compete.
