General SPL General discussion of Sound Pressure Level topics.

Soundigital tests continued

Old 09-02-2008, 10:00 PM
  #11  
Guest
iTrader: (1)
 
Soundigital's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 809
No Aaron, I did not say anything that you write.
Soundigital is offline  
Old 09-02-2008, 10:32 PM
  #12  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (17)
 
worldind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,029
Soundigital gift certificate if we can name that twin?
worldind is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:17 AM
  #13  
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Father Yuli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,606
Originally Posted by aaron yates
yes i am posting them right now. got the kinks worked out and am now able to upload the vids.
so you are telling me my vehicle is peaked out, doesnt gain with power? i dont think thats the case at all seeing as i have done much better #s then that with more power added. i think it needs good power to get louder not clipped to hell power. like i said from 11-13,000 watts it hit the same # due to the quality of power. the amp obviously was peaked out not the install. and for the street loss in spl you are saying team riprock needs lessons on tuning a enclosure?

ok first the stetsom

the movie


now the sd8000
the movie

i dont know you or anything about you but to do around 147 db's with over 10k of power clipped or not is less than impressive. especially in what seems to be a crx???

and you gain with more power? you need more than 10k to break 147?

and you are sure you got 11,000 watts from this amp in your street B set up?

and with 11,000 watts it did 146 something?

i'd have to say that either your test/vids are fishy, especially with respect to the spl numbers shown, OR your design is HORRIBLE.

what does not seem to add up is the fact that you managed to get 11,000 watts on a street B set up AND only produce a 146.x?

i dunno man, in my crx i can get 150 with about 1200 watts. if 11,000 watts was what you really got and 146.x was the max number you produced I'd have to say Murilo sent the amp to a very wrong person. And I'm not talkin about Don.
Father Yuli is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:27 AM
  #14  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
CoreyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by Father Yuli
i dont know you or anything about you but to do around 147 db's with over 10k of power clipped or not is less than impressive. especially in what seems to be a crx???

and you gain with more power? you need more than 10k to break 147?

and you are sure you got 11,000 watts from this amp in your street B set up?

and with 11,000 watts it did 146 something?

i'd have to say that either your test/vids are fishy, especially with respect to the spl numbers shown, OR your design is HORRIBLE.

what does not seem to add up is the fact that you managed to get 11,000 watts on a street B set up AND only produce a 146.x?

i dunno man, in my crx i can get 150 with about 1200 watts. if 11,000 watts was what you really got and 146.x was the max number you produced I'd have to say Murilo sent the amp to a very wrong person. And I'm not talkin about Don.
Well if you take a look at the second video you can see the multimeter and clamp meter and it shows that the amp only made 3253w. And I wouldn't say team riprock are the wrong people to be testing amps.
CoreyC is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:30 AM
  #15  
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Father Yuli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,606
so how much power did the amp make? 11,000 watts or 3,000 watts?
Father Yuli is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:32 AM
  #16  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
CoreyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by Father Yuli
so how much power did the amp make? 11,000 watts or 3,000 watts?
3000w on 12v, 11000 on 16v
CoreyC is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:35 AM
  #17  
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
dB Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,113
Yuli I think in the video of the SD 8000 there was 122.3 ACV and 26.6 ACA = 3253 wrms. The note sounded like 58 hz to me. Either way I don't feel it would have changed the outcome. I had a short time to test it and I made suggestions, lets see if someone is listening.
dB Don is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:36 AM
  #18  
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (3)
 
PsychoAcoustics Canada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,364
i think im gonna have to agree with yuli on this one. something is way wrong here, im seriously doubting these test results. I can do better than that in my aveo with 1 12 and im a rookie.
PsychoAcoustics Canada is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:37 AM
  #19  
Level 3 Supporter
iTrader: (17)
 
Father Yuli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 11,606
oh ok. i didnt watch the whole vid, just till the number came up.
Father Yuli is offline  
Old 09-03-2008, 12:41 AM
  #20  
50 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
CoreyC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 230
They also had these subs TREO Engineering | TSi Series Subwoofers in the CRX when they did the testing so I would think thats not that bad of a score for a pair of cheap 200w subs.
CoreyC is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Soundigital tests continued



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 PM.