General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

alpine f#1 status

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #22  
sawnicxs's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 233
I think what Dukk means is that people will resort to making it easier to overcome the challenges of making a good soundstage in a car by changing the aspects of the listener orientation to the transducers as opposed to using applied science, install techniques, and tuning to have a truly great install in a car that has both seats.

If that is in fact what he is saying, I do see the value in that statement. There are those who will opt to do a single seat, and those who will not, but is it not fun to share the enjoyment with someone once in a while. I think there is also some self gratification with getting a really great sound from both seats instead of just one. It's about overcoming the acoustical environment that a car gives you in such a way that the car doesn't become or look like an amusement ride at the fair.

I do also understand the single seat thing too. If it is truly about getting the absolute best you can get in any single seat location, obviously a single seater would be optimal and defro's point would be correct.

As for me, I am a two seat SQ fan myself, but then again, I just love a great sound whenever I am exposed to it.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 04:41 PM
  #23  
Dukk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,860
Lightbulb

^ Well if you want to pretty it up a bit...

It is an opinion anyway. One seat cars are a creation of convenience rather than good solid system design.
Old Mar 11, 2006 | 06:20 PM
  #24  
fozzz's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,339
I have yet to hear a car that sounded awesome from both seats, that had realistic seating positions. At least not from cars without a center channel.
Single seat cars make sense for most people. All of my cars upto this point have been driver side biased. But this year will be a little different.

I also had a chance to hear the Be's in two different cars. Both had a lot of time put in to their installs. They did sound good, but for the money, I'll stick to my Scan Speaks.
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 10:49 AM
  #25  
The Icon's Avatar
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 125
Agreed I did talk about install ( busted ) but I also talked about using the right driver for the right application.

James thanks for the plug, I think you have done the single best job with ext drivers I have yet to see. The work you put into your car to make everything sound there best astounded me.
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #26  
JohnVroom's Avatar
Yankee
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,599
?

Originally Posted by defro13
how many people on this board have used any of the alpine f#1 status products
Defro- were you going to go somewhere with this? I was curious what you were going to talk about. This is certainly one of the best HU out there (Pioneer P9, Clairion DRX9255, I guess the Mac is competition but it is certainly the opposite of the other HU).

What features are inherent to the current HU if I were to simply hook it up to a D/A?
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 04:56 PM
  #28  
fozzz's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,339
I dont think I would call the P9 VW. More like a Corvete.
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #29  
Dukk's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,860
Lightbulb

John - IMO Dave was trying to bait me as I always pipe in with "F#1 products are overpriced/not worth the money"

Which...their not - in my opinion..
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 01:04 PM
  #30  
theboy's Avatar
1000 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,267
have you converted Dukk?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 PM.