General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

SQ improvement with ARC SE Amps

Old Sep 28, 2010 | 07:34 PM
  #31  
avidedtr's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
Originally Posted by lpchouinard
there's a difference between a single sinewave and music (harmonics), try to compare a song playing from 2 amps on a scope... good luck
Game, Set, MATCH!!!! Good Bye!
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 07:49 PM
  #32  
AAAAAAA's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,010
Narrow minded? Hardly!
THIS is the epitome of narrow mindedness:
hear it in my home and in my car so my ears will trump any test.
So here is a great opportunity for some to gain knowledge. Its perfect for this topic:

Audio Musings by Sean Olive: The Dishonesty of Sighted Listening Tests
... In other words, if you want to obtain an accurate and reliable measure of how the audio product truly sounds, the listening test must be done blind.
The above is not a nobody, this was a study conducted by harman with harman employees. Still choose to ignore psycho accoustics and not "beleive in it"? This is silly....

Here is another geat one
http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/Amp_Sound.pdf
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 07:55 PM
  #33  
avidedtr's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
Narrow minded? Hardly!
THIS is the epitome of narrow mindedness:

So here is a great opportunity for some to gain knowledge. Its perfect for this topic:

Audio Musings by Sean Olive: The Dishonesty of Sighted Listening Tests


The above is not a nobody, this was a study conducted by harman with harman employees. Still choose to ignore psycho accoustics and not "beleive in it"? This is silly....

Here is another geat one
http://bruce.coppola.name/audio/Amp_Sound.pdf
So I guess I'll go to my basement and enjoy my over priced narrow minded audio system.
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 08:02 PM
  #34  
AAAAAAA's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,010
Originally Posted by lpchouinard
there's a difference between a single sinewave and music (harmonics), try to compare a song playing from 2 amps on a scope... good luck
Well any signal, in time, can be represented as a summation of sine waves. So I don't see how your claim invalidates anything.

Quoted part of the above from lycan. hehe
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 08:22 PM
  #35  
lpchouinard's Avatar
500 Watt CAFz'r
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 819
Originally Posted by AAAAAAA
Well any signal, in time, can be represented as a summation of sine waves.
How can you compare the harmonic distortion?


There's some merit in what you're saying, but i do believe that there's a difference between amps (specially cheap VS highend)
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 10:32 PM
  #36  
fozzz's Avatar
Thread Starter
1000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,339
When I said I don't believe in psycho acoustics, I was referring to myself. I don't feel I effected by my eyes when listening to audio gear. I know people can sometimes hear with their eyes, but for the most part these are the easily manipulated or poorly educated (in audio) listeners. I trust my ears and only my ears. I have no bias about a products price or it's name. I've been doing this too long to care about such things.

Speaker choice and placement are the most important part of any audio system. No question there. But other equipment can have an effect as well in my opinion.

This will sound a little arrogant, but I don't bother listening to anyones opinion but my own when it comes to audio. That isn't to say I don't hear what is
being said, just that if I can't hear the difference, all the technical mumbo jumbo is meaningless. I trust my ears and no ones elses.

My only suggestion to anyone reading this is to take the time to hear some good home gear and do their own testing. Hearing differences in gear isn't all that hard if you have the right place to do it in. The differences may not be much, but if your into good sound, the change might be worth it.

Part of the problem is also that most listeners don't have the experience to tell the difference between sounds. I can't tell you what ingredients are in most of my meals, but I know some people can, simply by tasting.

And as cheesy as it sounds audio is more than FR graphs. Music is not a science, it's emotion and passion. No test gear is able to do what the ear and mind can do.

Last edited by fozzz; Sep 28, 2010 at 10:37 PM. Reason: My spilling suuks
Old Sep 28, 2010 | 10:45 PM
  #37  
wasted911's Avatar
Moderator

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,285
My Memphis 4K sounds a lot better than my old Power Acoustik amp..


lol
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 08:17 AM
  #38  
Junkinthetrunk's Avatar
--SPECIAL ED--
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 296
SE amps are the best sounding amps EVA built !!!
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #39  
avidedtr's Avatar
2000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,544
Originally Posted by fozzz
When I said I don't believe in psycho acoustics, I was referring to myself. I don't feel I effected by my eyes when listening to audio gear. I know people can sometimes hear with their eyes, but for the most part these are the easily manipulated or poorly educated (in audio) listeners. I trust my ears and only my ears. I have no bias about a products price or it's name. I've been doing this too long to care about such things.

Speaker choice and placement are the most important part of any audio system. No question there. But other equipment can have an effect as well in my opinion.

This will sound a little arrogant, but I don't bother listening to anyones opinion but my own when it comes to audio. That isn't to say I don't hear what is
being said, just that if I can't hear the difference, all the technical mumbo jumbo is meaningless. I trust my ears and no ones elses.

My only suggestion to anyone reading this is to take the time to hear some good home gear and do their own testing. Hearing differences in gear isn't all that hard if you have the right place to do it in. The differences may not be much, but if your into good sound, the change might be worth it.

Part of the problem is also that most listeners don't have the experience to tell the difference between sounds. I can't tell you what ingredients are in most of my meals, but I know some people can, simply by tasting.

And as cheesy as it sounds audio is more than FR graphs. Music is not a science, it's emotion and passion. No test gear is able to do what the ear and mind can do.
I couldn't agree more
Old Sep 29, 2010 | 11:06 AM
  #40  
goalie 35's Avatar
Goalie Man
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,412
Originally Posted by Junkinthetrunk
SE amps are the best sounding amps EVA built !!!
in Canada we say ever.. lol...

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 PM.