Tweeters
Thoughts on the Usher 9950 tweet? After doing some research, it seems very competitive to the scan-speak 9500 tweet though at a fraction of the prices. In similar comparisons, it beat out the Dyn esotec D260 as well. Quite interesting. I decided to pick up a pair off ebay for $100 to try them out.
Might be something to consider.
Might be something to consider.
Originally posted by Dukk:
"I've never had a problem, although they do usually need to be smoothed out using a good EQ."
um... [img]graemlins/freak.gif[/img]
"I've never had a problem, although they do usually need to be smoothed out using a good EQ."
um... [img]graemlins/freak.gif[/img]
They sound great, lower freq's tend to be too bright. That's what I was getting at.
The whole freq range on them is bright, that's just TN51's, they've always been like that, but I find that anywhere from 2500-7K is pretty bright...brighter than say 8-10K.Not sure of the reasion for this. The TN45's were like that too but they were a harsh tweeter to begin with.
I'm sure install plays a big role in that too....I've heard mostly a-pillar mounted TN51's and kick mounted TN45's.....when the TN45 is in the pillar it is really bright, needs an eq manufactured by Jesus himself to smooth it out.
I'm sure install plays a big role in that too....I've heard mostly a-pillar mounted TN51's and kick mounted TN45's.....when the TN45 is in the pillar it is really bright, needs an eq manufactured by Jesus himself to smooth it out.
