General SQ General discussion of Sound Quality related issues.

Testing....4,5,6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2004, 12:07 PM
  #61  
sac
50 Watt CAFz'r
 
sac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 73
Post

I agree that one can sense the source of sub frequencies. Not sure why, but in my two vehicles I have tried Adam's experiment (turn off the front stage...) and I can certainly tell that the sub is mounted in the back.

I'll have to try lowering the low-pass cut-off frequency to see if it makes a difference.

[ November 16, 2004, 01:11 PM: Message edited by: sac ]
sac is offline  
Old 11-16-2004, 01:30 PM
  #62  
4000 Watt CAFz'r
iTrader: (1)
 
Brandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,603
Post

It's all an illusion for your ears.

With the front end turned off there is nothing to mask the vibrations/resonance/rattles, however small they are, that you hear coming from the back of the vehicle.

So if you have a decent 3 way set-up it really directs your attention to the front stage and the midbass more or less draws the sub-bass forward. A good midbass can play down to or past 60Hz and anything after 100Hz( I believe) is omni-directional.....therefore making your subbass seem like it's up front.

Like I said, it's all an illusion....untill you put a sub up front....but I still believe up-front bass is achievable with a rear mounted sub......it would simply take a lot of time, deadening and a low x-over frequency.
Brandon is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vizion
General Discussion
3
01-21-2006 12:14 PM
peemoeller
General Discussion
1
12-05-2005 08:49 AM
Thumper89
General Discussion
3
08-25-2005 12:28 AM
Vizion
General Discussion
13
11-27-2003 10:13 PM
JaeS
General Discussion
4
11-11-2003 06:02 AM



Quick Reply: Testing....4,5,6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.