MTX's new 22" 10KW sub
02-13-2005, 03:02 PM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Haunz:
Dw, the only info they give is that the 'SPL' version has dual 2ohm coils instead of dual 4..
What Ive been trying to figure out is how your opinion can oppose mine so strongly when YOU haven't used one either ?????
Dw, the only info they give is that the 'SPL' version has dual 2ohm coils instead of dual 4..
What Ive been trying to figure out is how your opinion can oppose mine so strongly when YOU haven't used one either ?????
02-13-2005, 03:05 PM
#45
1000 Watt CAFz'r
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,145
^^I was just about to say exactly that, but Dereck beat me to it. DWVW didn't say a thing regarding his opinion of it. I was kind of reeling towards saying that, since I dont want to look like the antagonist here.
02-13-2005, 03:47 PM
#47
Originally posted by DWVW:
Read it again, it clearly says the cone can be changed as well. What is my opinion on this sub? What have I said it will sound like or whether it will be loud? Nothing, I haven't given my opinion on the sub BECAUSE I HAVEN'T HEARD ONE, just like you, of course that doesn't stop you from spouting off like it does normal people.
Read it again, it clearly says the cone can be changed as well. What is my opinion on this sub? What have I said it will sound like or whether it will be loud? Nothing, I haven't given my opinion on the sub BECAUSE I HAVEN'T HEARD ONE, just like you, of course that doesn't stop you from spouting off like it does normal people.
And by disagreeing with me, you are giving an opinion... and BTW I never even remember hearing anything about why I was or could be wrong.. just that I must be wrong because I don't know for sure...
I said..
1. Poor for SPL based on the probable cone weight and suspension.. (which is usually reflected by FS)
2. For alot less money you could match or exceed overall performance with 2 or more smaller drivers...
3. They could have made it alot lighter.. 300+lbs was probably a marketing ploy...
We will wait and see on # 1... And I dont think you are denying # 2 and # 3... If you want to say Iam 33% wrong, then I'll go along with that...
I actually think the thing is pretty cool.. and maybe it should be expensive as its all custom tooled, the market isnt huge, and its the biggest and baddest you can get....
fine, thats all well and good... I just think it would be better if they made it lighter weight so you could wall it in your sports or midsize car without cutting your gas mileage and performance like 2 fat girls would... it would also be hella easier to install...
[ February 13, 2005, 04:48 PM: Message edited by: Haunz ]
02-13-2005, 04:22 PM
#48
2000 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,406
Originally posted by Haunz:
1. Poor for SPL based on the probable cone weight and suspension.. (which is usually reflected by FS)
2. For alot less money you could match or exceed overall performance with 2 or more smaller drivers...
3. They could have made it alot lighter.. 300+lbs was probably a marketing ploy...
We will wait and see on # 1... And I dont think you are denying # 2 and # 3... If you want to say Iam 33% wrong, then I'll go along with that...
1. Poor for SPL based on the probable cone weight and suspension.. (which is usually reflected by FS)
2. For alot less money you could match or exceed overall performance with 2 or more smaller drivers...
3. They could have made it alot lighter.. 300+lbs was probably a marketing ploy...
We will wait and see on # 1... And I dont think you are denying # 2 and # 3... If you want to say Iam 33% wrong, then I'll go along with that...
02-13-2005, 04:28 PM
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
[quote]Originally posted by Haunz:
Right from the site, if you can't even read, how can you base your opinion on anything?
I am not disagreeing with you, I am saying you have no idea what the heck you are talking about, beleive it or not two different things.
[ February 13, 2005, 05:32 PM: Message edited by: DWVW ]
It dosent say anything about the SPL cone being different.. only the coil config..
And by disagreeing with me, you are giving an opinion... and BTW I never even remember hearing anything about why I was or could be wrong.. just that I must be wrong because I don't know for sure...
And by disagreeing with me, you are giving an opinion... and BTW I never even remember hearing anything about why I was or could be wrong.. just that I must be wrong because I don't know for sure...
"The JackHammer SuperWoofer represents excess in every way and this enormous subwoofer lives for high SPL and window shattering bass. But, the T9922 is designed for sonic quality, and high SPL, what we call SQL. JackHammers are shipped in either the SPL mode, with dual 2Ω voice coils, or as the SQL model with dual 4Ω voice coils. A replaceable cone assembly is also available, for switching between "every day" listening (SQL), and competition (SPL). Unlike traditional replacement assemblies, the MTX Audio Thunder9922 replacement assembly can be accomplished without removing the speaker from the enclosure. Fast, quick, and easy."
I am not disagreeing with you, I am saying you have no idea what the heck you are talking about, beleive it or not two different things.
[ February 13, 2005, 05:32 PM: Message edited by: DWVW ]
02-13-2005, 04:33 PM
#50
2000 Watt CAFz'r
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 2,406
Here is the link incase any of you can't find it.
That is all that is out there for info on the woofer...............
http://www.mtx.com/caraudio/products...jackHammer.cfm
That is all that is out there for info on the woofer...............
http://www.mtx.com/caraudio/products...jackHammer.cfm
