View Poll Results: Your thoughts on a new subwoofer
I would definately like to try them
53
62.35%
Not for me Sorry (
4
4.71%
Price is good
32
37.65%
Price is High
8
9.41%
They are missing features for my liking
1
1.18%
Would like higher power handling
17
20.00%
Power handling is fine
16
18.82%
Need different voice coil configuration
16
18.82%
Please no more new drivers
9
10.59%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 85. You may not vote on this poll
Smartass Subwoofer Testing
#33
Originally Posted by SPLn00b
nice, customer feedback is always good because sometimes they see problems the producer cant
#35
the 10" would fit my current set up (SQ orientated, small sealed application)
I'd be running it at 600w rms though @2ohm load.
If the dealer cost is right I'll do some daily beating for you and compare it to my 10w6v3
let me know when u get them and what the dealer cost will be on them.
Cheers
J
I'd be running it at 600w rms though @2ohm load.
If the dealer cost is right I'll do some daily beating for you and compare it to my 10w6v3
let me know when u get them and what the dealer cost will be on them.
Cheers
J
#37
Originally Posted by df.dima
Fs is a bit highish, but I'm on the sq side of things.
otherwise xmax and porerhandling is right on the spot of my needs. no need for kilowatts of power .
otherwise xmax and porerhandling is right on the spot of my needs. no need for kilowatts of power .
#39
I know the Mach 5 are cheaper price wise. But we found when testing a Mach 5 we encountered quite of bit of cone noise just slightly over the power handling of the sub. They do work well in a 4th order though. And we also found the suspension to be very soft. Dont get me wrong for the price of the Mach they are a good deal. And Mark knows his stuff and is a great guy. We just tried to over build these drivers and spent a little extra on certain parts. Hence the cost difference. Kind of designed it around things that I wanted in a driver.